Browsing by Subject "Grasskulturen"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1

Biomonitoring von Fluorwasserstoff : neue Ansätze zum Einsatz Höherer Pflanzen als Akkumulationsindikatoren
(2009) Blanckart, Peter; Fangmeier, Andreas
The standardised grass culture as described in VDI guideline 3957 sheet 2 has successfully been used for years to identify pollution related effects and to assess pollution load with hydrogen fluoride. At the moment, two directives are in preparation for the evaluation of the results from the exposure of standardised grass cultures which provide scales for judging and values for orientation on the basis of detailed studies. The directives will be published as VDI 3857 sheet 1 and sheet 2 as green print in 2009. The directive VDI 2310 sheet 3 is being revised as well. Its publication (green print) is also expected for 2009. According to no. 5.3 of the directive VDI 3957 sheet 2, samples with less than 2 g of dry substance have to be rejected. However, the rejection of these samples leads to a time gap for assessing of 14 days or even of 4 weeks. In this context it should be tested how the accumulation of fluoride after exposure with air containing hydrogen fluoride would be affected at lower growth rates. It should also be tested if samples of exposed grass with a minimum weight of less than the required 2 g of dry substance can be used for determining the pollution situation. To evaluate these problems, exposures were performed with standardised grass cultures and with modified methodology in an area ? the city of Ransbach-Baumbach ? which is highly contaminated by fluorides. Parallel to bioindication, the fluoride concentration in the air was assessed with radial symmetric passive samplers as a physicochemical method. By this means a direct comparison of the concentration of air pollutants with the pollutant concentration in the grass could be performed. The tests confirmed that the study area is indeed quite contaminated with fluoride from anthropogenic sources. The area around Ransbach-Baumbach can be considered as a hot-spot for higher fluoride concentrations within Germany. The results confirm that fluoride pollution in Central Europe is still an ongoing problem, even though the pollution is mostly scattered and small scale limited. Therefore, evaluation fundamentals for bioindication methods for fluoride (passive and active) should be worked out for the future, although fluoride accumulations are no longer regularly determined in large scale bioindication monitoring networks. The application of Deschampsia flexuosa (L.) Trin. as an accumulation indicator as a possible alternative to Lolium multiflorum Lam. could not be confirmed in this study; the deviations of fluoride concentrations in Deschampsia flexuosa (L.) Trin. and in Lolium multiflorum Lam. were too large in the spatiotemporal comparison. The measurements performed with radialsymmetric passive samplers did not show a good relationship between the hydrogen fluoride concentration in the air and the fluoride concentration F- [µg g-1 ds] in the Lolium grass cultures. There were only very low correlations between the fluoride concentration and the increase of biomass as raw and dry weight of Lolium multiflorum Lam. (R2 of 0.0258 and 0.0099 at two measurement stations, respectively). Since conventionally an R2 of ≥ 0,6 is required to indicate significant relationships in ecological/ecotoxicological field studies, no link between the increase of biomass and fluoride concentration for the accumulation indicator Lolium multiflorum Lam. is concluded. Therefore, it is recommended to revise the VDI guideline 3957 sheet 2 so that standardised grass culture samples of less than 2 g dry substance are also accounted for in the determination of the accumulation of air pollutants like fluoride in plants.