publ-ohne-podpubl-ohne-podNeef, AndreasNeubert, Dieter2024-04-082024-04-082005-07-052004https://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/5015Recent discourse in the field of agricultural research has focused on how to assess and optimize the use of participatory approaches. In this paper, we propose a new Analytical Framework for the Assessment of Participatory Agricultural Research (AFAPAR) that seeks to evaluate participatory research elements along different dimensions and over several research phases and thus takes into account the complexity and dynamics of agricultural research projects. Empirical data from a long-term collaborative research program on ?Sustainable Land Use and Rural Development in Mountainous Regions of Southeast Asia? (The Uplands Program ? SFB 564) are used to explore the potential and shortcomings of AFAPAR. Findings suggest that while there is a need for further refinement, the analytical framework provides a sound basis for a differentiated assessment of participatory approaches in agricultural research that goes beyond the existing one-dimensional typologies of participatory research with their inherent claim of ?the more participation, the better?.enghttp://opus.uni-hohenheim.de/doku/lic_ubh.phpParticipatory approachesAgricultural researchAnalytical frameworkAssessment630AgrarforschungPartizipationForschungsprojektEvaluationAssessing participation in agricultural research projects: an analytical frameworkWorkingPaper118786717urn:nbn:de:bsz:100-opus-928