Institut für Pflanzenbau und Grünland (bis 2010)

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/42

Nachfolgeinstitut ab 2011: Institut für Landschafts- und Pflanzenökologie

Browse

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1

Die Ökobilanz zur Abschätzung von Umweltwirkungen in der Pflanzenproduktion - dargestellt anhand von Praxisversuchen zur konservierenden Bodenbearbeitung und von unterschiedlich intensiv wirtschaftenden konventionellen Betrieben
(2003) Arman, Beate; Claupein, Wilhelm
In the agricultural field difficulties in life-cycle assessment result from the fact that the methods of life-cycle assessment were developed in techno-industrial production. Agricultural production, however, differs from industrial production in that it depends more strongly on natural resources and, moreover, has a direct influence on them. Hence, apart from preparing data for the used production goods, the expansion of environmental impact categories to include specific effects from agriculture is focused on in the adaptation of ecobalances as an agricultural method. Among others deficiencies here include the balancing of effects in agriculturally utilized soil. The ecobalances at hand were carried out with two different goals in mind. For one, the impact of conventional and conservational cultivation methods were to be balanced. The goal of this ecobalance was to show whether life-cycle assessment have adequate selective power in order to be used as a decision criterion in the optimisation of cultural methods and their environmental impact. For another, the intensity of cultivation of three agricultural enterprises was compared. It was to be shown here whether life-cycle assessment can provide transparency as to the environmental effects of various production methods, which would enable the consumer to obtain information on the environmental relevance of these methods. A further goal of this work was the development of a method for the recording of effects on the soil in life-cycle assessment. The examined farms are situated in the Hohenlohe region and were integrated in the subproject "Conservation Tillage" of the "Cultural Landscape Hohenlohe" project group. In order to balance soil working methods, the three methods plow, cultivator and mulch sowing were examined. The data was obtained from two test fields with the same crop rotation on one of the farms. Balancing of the intensity of cultivation was carried out on three conventionally working farms using varying levels of fertilizer, crop protectants and tillage. The balanced crop rotation of the three farms did not vary (sugar-beets, winter wheat, winter barley). When developing methods for balancing environmental effects on agriculturally utilized soil three aspects were decisive in the selection of balanced effects: 1. What soil properties are there? 2. Which of these properties are influenced directly by cultivation measures? 3. For which properties are relevant negative effects caused by agriculture known? Based on the indicated methods the impact was assessed for the following soil properties: - Soil depth is influenced by soil loss. Soil loss was calculated with the universal soil loss equation. - Impact on the nutrient content was assessed with the help of a nutrient field balance, humus content with the help of a humus balance. - Variations in soil density caused by loading were assessed with the help of the weighted soil load. - Soil life is affected by pollutant input, modelling of the effect potential was carried out with the help of the Critical-Surface-Time model. All in all the results show that in order to differentiate between the tillage variants with respect to their environmental impact, it is necessary to also consider effects on the soil. Comparison of the farms showed that life-cycle assessment can reflect the environmental relevance of different cultivation intensities and can make them visible for the consumer.

Browse

Browsing Institut für Pflanzenbau und Grünland (bis 2010) by Person "Arman, Beate"