Achtung: hohPublica wurde am 18.11.2024 aktualisiert. Falls Sie auf Darstellungsfehler stoßen, löschen Sie bitte Ihren Browser-Cache (Strg + Umschalt + Entf). *** Attention: hohPublica was last updated on November 18, 2024. If you encounter display errors, please delete your browser cache (Ctrl + Shift + Del).

Landesanstalt für Bienenkunde

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/33

Browse

Browsing Landesanstalt für Bienenkunde by Person "Fölsch, Lina"

Type the first few letters and click on the Browse button
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Auslöser und Ausprägung des Varroa Sensitiven Hygiene (VSH) Verhaltens im Zusammenhang mit der Reproduktion der Varroamilbe Varroa destructor
    (2024) Fölsch, Lina; Hasselmann, Martin
    The ectoparasite Varroa destructor causes massive economic damages to the Western honey bee (Apis mellifera) and thus threatens the health of honey bee colonies worldwide. When left untreated, varroa populations can lead to high winter colony losses (Genersch et al. 2010; Traynor et al. 2020; Le Conte et al. 2010). Beekeepers must thus routinely treat against varroa to keep their colonies healthy. A sustainable solution to overcome the varroa problem is selection for varroa resistant honey bees. In addition to studies on natural selection against varroa, there is much interest in breeding varroa resistant honey bees. During varroa resistant selection the focus is often on different selection criteria, such as mite non-reproduction (MNR) and varroa sensitive hygiene (VSH). The selection criteria MNR describes the proportion of non-reproductive mites in a colony (Virag et al. 2022). VSH encompasses the specialized removal behavior of mite infested brood by worker bees (Dietemann et al. 2013; Harbo und Harris 2005). This brood removal interrupts varroa reproduction, which leads to reduced varroa infestation in honey bee colonies. The experiments in thesis were conducted as part of the SETBie project. The SETBie (Selection and Establishment of Varroa-tolerant Bee Colonies) project was a four-year selection project whose objectives included breeding a varroa-resistant honey bee in Baden-Württemberg, Germany. Several institutions and beekeeper organizations cooperated in this project. This dissertation focuses on the factors that trigger VSH behaviour, in addition to documenting the reproductive success of the mite (MNR) in selected colonies. Initial experiments investigated the relationship between VSH and the reproductive success of female Varroa (MNR). A widely held hypothesis was that the reproduction of the mite and the associated nymphal stages in the brood cells triggered the removal behaviour of the workers. However, this hypothesis was disproved by placing mites in capped brood cells and comparing the removal behaviour of reproducing mites with that of mites whose reproduction had been blocked by a special procedure (publication 1). Both groups of mites were removed at a rate of about 40% and did not differ significantly from each other. Therefore, reproduction of the mite could be excluded as a trigger for removal behavior of the workers. This result was supported by simultaneous analysis of VSH behaviour and the proportion of non-reproductive mites (MNR) in a large number of pre-selected colonies. It was also assumed that the increased number of non-reproductive mites (MNR) within a colony is directly connected to VSH behaviour, because the workers would primarily remove the reproductive mites, leaving only non-reproductive mites behind. In addition to providing evidence that mite reproduction is not the trigger of removal behaviour, our analysis of the data collected during the SETBie project showed no correlation between MNR and VSH values (publication 3). The MNR value of a colony therefore does not allow any conclusions to be drawn about the VSH value, which should be taken into account in recommendations for breeding practices. Furthermore, an experiment was conducted to rule out the possibility that removal behaviour effects the normal reproduction of the mite in the next cycle (publication 3). The need for other triggering factors for removal behaviour to occur was clearly demonstrated in this first set of experiments. Varroa mites manipulated to remove specific factors and inanimate objects were placed in capped brood cells to determine what influences removal behaviour. We found that an object (bead) alone does not induce removal behaviour (publication 2). Dead and odour-reduced mites were removed more frequently than the bead and control, but not anywhere near as frequently as live mites. We can thus assume that, in addition to the odour of the mite, the movement of the mite in particular has a signalling effect that triggers this removal behaviour. Other as yet unknown factors such as the reaction of the larvae to the parasitism are likely to play an important role in the removal behaviour of workers. The SETBie project took place over a period of four years, which allowed us to analyse colonies over several generations. Although MNR and VSH are in principle selectable traits, our analysis has shown that they are difficult to improve over multiple generations (publication 4). Colonies with low MNR values could often be improved by crossing them with a drone (artificial insemination) from a colony with a high MNR value. However, it also became clear that it is difficult to maintain high MNR values. Methodological difficulties in targeted selection of MNR/VSH also became noticeable during the collaborative project, which involved the cooperation of numerous breeders. Despite prior infestation of the selected colonies with 180 mites, it was often not possible to collect enough mites to make a valid statement about the reproductive capability of the mite. Even after opening many cells, the minimum number of 10 single infested cells could not be found, which means that MNR values could not be determined for about 63 % of the evaluated colonies due to the presence of too few mites. The selection and breeding work involved in this project is extremely labour-intensive and therefore expensive and requires a high level of expertise among the breeders. It was shown that MNR and VSH are in principle selectable and thus theoretically a Varroa-resistant honey bee line can be bred. However, for future projects, methodological problems need to be resolved or the evaluation methods of the MNR and VSH traits need to be simplified. An optimal solution would be the identification of molecular markers to support selection via genetic heritability. However, this requires further fundamental knowledge about the Varroa mite, the mechanisms that trigger the behaviour of the currently used selection traits, and more precise phenotypic definition of the resistant behaviours.