Browsing by Person "Ernst, Ulrich R."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3

Conserved worker policing in African carpenter ants with drastically different egg chemotypes
(2023) Buellesbach, Jan; Rinke, Janina; Reuter, Leonie; Thomas, Jurian M.; Hartmann, Vivien; Pohl, Marius; Gadau, Jürgen; Ernst, Ulrich R.
Distinctive chemical signatures have the potential to serve as discriminatory cues for olfactory recognition mechanisms. Cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profiles are among the most prominent chemical signatures in insects that can be highly diverse even among closely related species and between populations with similar ecology. Particularly within the major insect order Hymenoptera, CHC profiles are characterized by high complexity and variation with the potential to evolve rapidly. In this study, we found two very distinct CHC chemotypes distinguishing sympatric colonies of the African carpenter ant Camponotus maculatus (Hymenoptera: Formicinae). These chemotypic differences were mainly detected on the surface profiles of eggs produced by either queens or isolated worker groups. In one chemotype, queen- and worker-laid eggs are very similar. This is largely contrasted by the other chemotype, where queen-laid eggs clearly differ from worker-laid eggs with several prominent queen-exclusive compounds. However, workers display a stable behavior of discriminating against and selectively disposing of worker-laid eggs i.e., worker policing, independent of egg chemotype. Furthermore, genetic barcoding of workers revealed a clear separation between colonies characterized by producing these two distinct egg chemotypes, which may indicate that these colonies belong to a cryptic species complex. Interestingly, worker policing behaviour appears to be evolutionarily conserved, despite the strikingly different egg surface profiles.
Digest: Better constructing the future than choosing a new habitat
(2022) Ernst, Ulrich R.
What strategy should an individual follow in a heterogeneous environment when its phenotype is not optimized for its current environment: make changes to the environment (habitat construction), move to a different place (habitat choice), or both? Scheiner et al. used an individual‐based model to investigate the interaction of habitat choice and habitat construction. In most situations, habitat construction was superior to either habitat selection or a mixed strategy.
Evolutionary genomics of socially polymorphic populations of Pogonomyrmex californicus
(2024) Errbii, Mohammed; Ernst, Ulrich R.; Lajmi, Aparna; Privman, Eyal; Gadau, Jürgen; Schrader, Lukas; Errbii, Mohammed; Molecular Evolution and Sociobiology Group, Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Hüfferstr. 1, DE-48149, Münster, Germany; Ernst, Ulrich R.; Molecular Evolution and Sociobiology Group, Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Hüfferstr. 1, DE-48149, Münster, Germany; Lajmi, Aparna; Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel; Privman, Eyal; Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel; Gadau, Jürgen; Molecular Evolution and Sociobiology Group, Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Hüfferstr. 1, DE-48149, Münster, Germany; Schrader, Lukas; Molecular Evolution and Sociobiology Group, Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Hüfferstr. 1, DE-48149, Münster, Germany
Background: Social insects vary considerably in their social organization both between and within species. In the California harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex californicus (Buckley 1867), colonies are commonly founded and headed by a single queen (haplometrosis, primary monogyny). However, in some populations in California (USA), unrelated queens cooperate not only during founding (pleometrosis) but also throughout the life of the colony (primary polygyny). The genetic architecture and evolutionary dynamics of this complex social niche polymorphism (haplometrosis vs pleometrosis) have remained unknown. Results: We provide a first analysis of its genomic basis and evolutionary history using population genomics comparing individuals from a haplometrotic population to those from a pleometrotic population. We discovered a recently evolved (< 200 k years), 8-Mb non-recombining region segregating with the observed social niche polymorphism. This region shares several characteristics with supergenes underlying social polymorphisms in other socially polymorphic ant species. However, we also find remarkable differences from previously described social supergenes. Particularly, four additional genomic regions not in linkage with the supergene show signatures of a selective sweep in the pleometrotic population. Within these regions, we find for example genes crucial for epigenetic regulation via histone modification (chameau) and DNA methylation (Dnmt1). Conclusions: Altogether, our results suggest that social morph in this species is a polygenic trait involving a potential young supergene. Further studies targeting haplo- and pleometrotic individuals from a single population are however required to conclusively resolve whether these genetic differences underlie the alternative social phenotypes or have emerged through genetic drift.