Repository logo
Log In
Log in as University member:
Log in as external user:
Have you forgotten your password?

Please contact the hohPublica team if you do not have a valid Hohenheim user account (hohPublica@uni-hohenheim.de)
Hilfe
  • English
  • Deutsch
    Communities & Collections
    All of hohPublica
Log In
Log in as University member:
Log in as external user:
Have you forgotten your password?

Please contact the hohPublica team if you do not have a valid Hohenheim user account (hohPublica@uni-hohenheim.de)
Hilfe
  • English
  • Deutsch
  1. Home
  2. Person

Browsing by Person "Rillig, Matthias C."

Type the first few letters and click on the Browse button
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Revisiting soil fungal biomarkers and conversion factors: interspecific variability in phospholipid fatty acids, ergosterol and rDNA copy numbers
    (2024) Camenzind, Tessa; Haslwimmer, Heike; Rillig, Matthias C.; Ruess, Liliane; Finn, Damien R.; Tebbe, Christoph C.; Hempel, Stefan; Marhan, Sven
    Refined conversion factors for soil fungal biomarkers are proposed. High interspecific variability is present in all fungal biomarkers. A modeling approach supports the validity of biomarker estimates in diverse soils. ITS1 copies vary strongly, but are fungal-specific with least phylogenetic bias. A combination of fungal biomarkers will reveal soil fungal physiology and activity. The abundances of fungi and bacteria in soil are used as simple predictors for carbon dynamics, and represent widely available microbial traits. Soil biomarkers serve as quantitative estimates of these microbial groups, though not quantifying microbial biomass per se. The accurate conversion to microbial carbon pools, and an understanding of its comparability among soils is therefore needed. We refined conversion factors for classical fungal biomarkers, and evaluated the application of quantitative PCR (qPCR, rDNA copies) as a biomarker for soil fungi. Based on biomarker contents in pure fungal cultures of 30 isolates tested here, combined with comparable published datasets, we propose average conversion factors of 95.3 g fungal C g −1 ergosterol, 32.0 mg fungal C µmol −1 PLFA 18:2ω6,9 and 0.264 pg fungal C ITS1 DNA copy −1 . As expected, interspecific variability was most pronounced in rDNA copies, though qPCR results showed the least phylogenetic bias. A modeling approach based on exemplary agricultural soils further supported the hypothesis that high diversity in soil buffers against biomarker variability, whereas also phylogenetic biases impact the accuracy of comparisons in biomarker estimates. Our analyses suggest that qPCR results cover the fungal community in soil best, though with a variability only partly offset in highly diverse soils. PLFA 18:2ω6,9 and ergosterol represent accurate biomarkers to quantify Ascomycota and Basidiomycota . To conclude, the ecological interpretation and coverage of biomarker data prior to their application in global models is important, where the combination of different biomarkers may be most insightful.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    A slow-fast trait continuum at the whole community level in relation to land-use intensification
    (2024) Neyret, Margot; Le Provost, Gaëtane; Boesing, Andrea Larissa; Schneider, Florian D.; Baulechner, Dennis; Bergmann, Joana; de Vries, Franciska T.; Fiore-Donno, Anna Maria; Geisen, Stefan; Goldmann, Kezia; Merges, Anna; Saifutdinov, Ruslan A.; Simons, Nadja K.; Tobias, Joseph A.; Zaitsev, Andrey S.; Gossner, Martin M.; Jung, Kirsten; Kandeler, Ellen; Krauss, Jochen; Penone, Caterina; Schloter, Michael; Schulz, Stefanie; Staab, Michael; Wolters, Volkmar; Apostolakis, Antonios; Birkhofer, Klaus; Boch, Steffen; Boeddinghaus, Runa S.; Bolliger, Ralph; Bonkowski, Michael; Buscot, François; Dumack, Kenneth; Fischer, Markus; Gan, Huei Ying; Heinze, Johannes; Hölzel, Norbert; John, Katharina; Klaus, Valentin H.; Kleinebecker, Till; Marhan, Sven; Müller, Jörg; Renner, Swen C.; Rillig, Matthias C.; Schenk, Noëlle V.; Schöning, Ingo; Schrumpf, Marion; Seibold, Sebastian; Socher, Stephanie A.; Solly, Emily F.; Teuscher, Miriam; van Kleunen, Mark; Wubet, Tesfaye; Manning, Peter; Neyret, Margot; Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Frankfurt, Germany; Le Provost, Gaëtane; INRAE, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, ISVV, SAVE, Villenave d’Ornon, France; Boesing, Andrea Larissa; Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Frankfurt, Germany; Schneider, Florian D.; Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Frankfurt, Germany; Baulechner, Dennis; Justus Liebig University, Department of Animal Ecology, Giessen, Germany; Bergmann, Joana; Leibniz Center for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany; de Vries, Franciska T.; Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Fiore-Donno, Anna Maria; Terrestrial Ecology, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany; Geisen, Stefan; Laboratory of Nematology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands; Goldmann, Kezia; Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Soil Ecology Department, Halle/Saale, Germany; Merges, Anna; Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Frankfurt, Germany; Saifutdinov, Ruslan A.; A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; Simons, Nadja K.; Ecological Networks, Technical University Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany; Tobias, Joseph A.; Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Ascot, UK; Zaitsev, Andrey S.; Justus Liebig University, Department of Animal Ecology, Giessen, Germany; Gossner, Martin M.; Forest Entomology, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland; Jung, Kirsten; Institut of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany; Kandeler, Ellen; Department of Soil Biology, Institute of Soil Science and Land Evaluation, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany; Krauss, Jochen; Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; Penone, Caterina; Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Schloter, Michael; Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen, Research Unit for Comparative Microbiome Analysis, Oberschleissheim, Germany; Schulz, Stefanie; Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen, Research Unit for Comparative Microbiome Analysis, Oberschleissheim, Germany; Staab, Michael; Ecological Networks, Technical University Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany; Wolters, Volkmar; Justus Liebig University, Department of Animal Ecology, Giessen, Germany; Apostolakis, Antonios; Department of Biogeochemical Processes, Max-Planck-Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany; Birkhofer, Klaus; Department of Ecology, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Cottbus, Germany; Boch, Steffen; Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland; Boeddinghaus, Runa S.; Department of Soil Biology, Institute of Soil Science and Land Evaluation, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany; Bolliger, Ralph; Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Bonkowski, Michael; Terrestrial Ecology, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany; Buscot, François; Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Soil Ecology Department, Halle/Saale, Germany; Dumack, Kenneth; Terrestrial Ecology, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany; Fischer, Markus; Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Gan, Huei Ying; Senckenberg Centre for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironments Tübingen (SHEP), Tübingen, Germany; Heinze, Johannes; Department of Biodiversity, Heinz Sielmann Foundation, Wustermark, Germany; Hölzel, Norbert; Institute of Landscape Ecology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; John, Katharina; Justus Liebig University, Department of Animal Ecology, Giessen, Germany; Klaus, Valentin H.; Institute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland; Kleinebecker, Till; Institute for Landscape Ecology and Resources Management (ILR), Research Centre for BioSystems, Land Use and Nutrition (iFZ), Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany; Marhan, Sven; Department of Soil Biology, Institute of Soil Science and Land Evaluation, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany; Müller, Jörg; Department of Nature Conservation, Heinz Sielmann Foundation, Wustermark, Germany; Renner, Swen C.; Ornithology, Natural History Museum Vienna, Vienna, Autria, Germany; Rillig, Matthias C.; Freie Universität Berlin, Institute of Biology, Berlin, Germany; Schenk, Noëlle V.; Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Schöning, Ingo; Department of Biogeochemical Processes, Max-Planck-Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany; Schrumpf, Marion; Department of Biogeochemical Processes, Max-Planck-Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany; Seibold, Sebastian; Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Life Sciences, Freising, Germany; Socher, Stephanie A.; Paris Lodron University Salzburg, Department Environment and Biodiversity, Salzburg, Austria; Solly, Emily F.; Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Computation Hydrosystems Department, Leipzig, Germany; Teuscher, Miriam; University of Göttingen, Centre of Biodiversity and Sustainable Land Use, Göttingen, Germany; van Kleunen, Mark; Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation, Taizhou University, Taizhou, China; Wubet, Tesfaye; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle - Jena-, Leipzig, Germany; Manning, Peter; Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Frankfurt, Germany
    Organismal functional strategies form a continuum from slow- to fast-growing organisms, in response to common drivers such as resource availability and disturbance. However, whether there is synchronisation of these strategies at the entire community level is unclear. Here, we combine trait data for >2800 above- and belowground taxa from 14 trophic guilds spanning a disturbance and resource availability gradient in German grasslands. The results indicate that most guilds consistently respond to these drivers through both direct and trophically mediated effects, resulting in a ‘slow-fast’ axis at the level of the entire community. Using 15 indicators of carbon and nutrient fluxes, biomass production and decomposition, we also show that fast trait communities are associated with faster rates of ecosystem functioning. These findings demonstrate that ‘slow’ and ‘fast’ strategies can be manifested at the level of whole communities, opening new avenues of ecosystem-level functional classification.

  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Cookie settings
  • Imprint/Privacy policy