Repository logo
Log In
Log in as University member:
Log in as external user:
Have you forgotten your password?

Please contact the hohPublica team if you do not have a valid Hohenheim user account (hohPublica@uni-hohenheim.de)
Hilfe
  • English
  • Deutsch
    Communities & Collections
    All of hohPublica
Log In
Log in as University member:
Log in as external user:
Have you forgotten your password?

Please contact the hohPublica team if you do not have a valid Hohenheim user account (hohPublica@uni-hohenheim.de)
Hilfe
  • English
  • Deutsch
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Subject

Browsing by Subject "Disadvantage"

Type the first few letters and click on the Browse button
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Framing inequality as advantage versus disadvantage: a systematic review of effects and a two-step model to explain them
    (2026) Malapally, Annette; Methner, Nicole; Braun, Maike; Wittenborn, Sophia; Bruckmüller, Susanne; Malapally, Annette; Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Methner, Nicole; Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Braun, Maike; Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Wittenborn, Sophia; Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Bruckmüller, Susanne; Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
    Although disadvantage and advantage jointly make up inequality, inequality is often one-sidedly framed as disadvantage. Concurrently, efforts to raise awareness for advantages are growing. Many studies have examined whether and how it matters if inequality is framed as advantage or disadvantage. However, empirical and conceptual integration of this work is lacking. For empirical integration, we systematically reviewed 71 experimental studies in 36 documents ( n  = 20,063). These investigated many different variables, but often only once, or with inconsistent findings. Framing manipulations varied in ways that could bias effects. Summarizing consistent effects, we conclude that framing can influence how people perceive and react to inequality, but this is contingent on moderators. For conceptual integration, we developed a two-step model, which defines (dis)advantage frames and aims to explain why (Step 1) and how (Step 2) they influence which variables, to help this exciting research field move forward in a more systematic way.

  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Cookie settings
  • Imprint/Privacy policy