Browsing by Subject "Ecosystem"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3

Ecosystemic Effect Indicators to assess Effects of agricultural Landuse on Ecosystems
(2000) Merkle, Andrea Hildegard; Kaupenjohann, Martin
Agricultural production and its material and non-material emissions may cause side-effects in ecosystems. These effects have to be assessed and evaluated. The aim of the present study is to provide a tool that relates emissions of agricultural production and affected ecosystems. This tool represents an indicator approach. The needed indicators are defined as ecosystemic effect indicators (EEI). Within the study a multistage procedure is developed which should be pursued in identifying indicators. To assess which emissions must be regarded in detail an estimation of relevance by means of an emission and input classification preceeds the indicator development. Subsequently, EEI are developed for the relevant emissions and inputs. The derivation of EEI is carried out by the following steps: 1) One starts top-down at the target 'maintaining the ecosystem functioning' in this work depicted by the utility functions. A list with characteristics that are dependent on hierarchical levels is compiled for each relevant function. 2) Starting at one specific input a list of potential receptors is compiled bottom-up. These represent potential effect indicators. 3) By overlapping the lists of the steps 1 and 2 one yields EEI specific for the utility function and the input under consideration. The step 3 is performed by means of expert knowledge. The advantage of the indicator approach is its operativeness which is site-independent. The results of the study show that EEI may be deemed to be promising tools to picture human influences in particular of agricultural production on ecosystems. The results of the case study provide the basis to assess effects on ecosystems for some major stressors. In cases where critical values are available site specific quantitative statements concerning ecological effects within the frame of sustainable agriculture are enabled by the present method for the derivation of indicators. Subsequently, necessary measures can be deduced
Ökosystem-Funktionen als Kriterium einer Operationalisierung ökologischer Aspekte von Nachhaltigkeit?
(2000) Doppler, Susanne Maria; Böcker, Reinhard
In recent times, against the background of system-theoretical principles, the description of ecosystems as complex, dynamic systems has been strongly promoted. Therefore the capacity of selforganization of ecosystems is strengthened to be integrated into environmental planning processes. The aim of the following work is to point out the limitations and possibilities given by the scientifically-based criterion 'ecosystem-functioning' in the context of sustainability. The investigations are based on a literature-supported analysis and a theoretical argument about the 'function of ecosystems' in relation to the concept of ecosystems. The results of this argument were submitted (1) to a scientific and science-theoretical analysis and criticism as well as considered in the light of (2) environmental protection issues and ethically relevant aspects of the description and observation of the natural world. The aim of this consideration was to establish to what extent the criterion 'ecosystem functioning' is suitable. The central question about limitations and possibilities of the application of the criterion is answered as follows: The criterion 'ecosystem functioning', formulated via system-theoretical principles of dynamic systems does not meet the requirements of both the natural and ethical issues given by the paradigm of sustainability. A possible alternative is to observe ecosystems and the criterion 'ecosystem-functioning' from a utilitarian position of anthroporelativism. The implementation of this perspective in the world of nature through the criterion 'ecosystem functioning' makes it possible (1) to integrate ethical issues of sustainability and (2) to maintain natural values as well as cultural ones in the countryside for this and future generations.
Unveiling the plant-associated microbiome responses and nitrification inhibition aspects of perennial intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium)
(2025) Issifu, Sulemana; Rasche, Frank
Perennialization of agriculture has recently garnered attention as a nature-based solution (NBS) to complement predominantly annual cropping systems, offering a pathway toward sustainable agriculture and enhanced protection of agroecosystems. In this regard, the perennial intermediate wheatgrass, Thinopyrum intermedium, trade name Kernza®, has been proposed as a model plant for achieving perennialization of cereal cropping systems. Kernza® provides a broad range of ecosystem services, including enhanced carbon sequestration, enhanced biodiversity, and regulation of the nitrogen (N) cycle. Some studies reported regulated nitrification in Kernza® fields through reduced N2O emissions, low N leaching, and high legacy N. These traits indicate a plant-exerted control of nitrification through the secretion of bioactive metabolites, a concept known as biological nitrification inhibition (BNI). However, no study had investigated the mechanism behind these BNI traits of Kernza®. Relatedly, existing BNI studies have largely been confined to the identification and testing of single and novel metabolites. Moreover, while some studies have reported the ability of Kernza® to stimulate microbial activity and enhance microbial diversity, there is currently no study in a European context on the potential influence of Kernza® on the rhizosphere microbiome. Thus, this doctoral study aimed to fill these knowledge gaps. The first study used a metabolome fingerprinting approach to profile the metabolome of the Kernza® biomass collected from the field and root exudates collected under N sources (ammonium (NH4+) versus nitrate (NO3-)) in a hydroponic system. Multiple nitrification inhibitors, including several phenolic metabolites, were identified in higher quantities in the biomass of Kernza® than in annual wheat. These metabolites were also concurrently exuded in higher quantities by the roots of Kernza® under NH4+-N source than NO3--N source. Bioassays involving multiple ammonia-oxidising bacteria and archaea (AOB and AOA) confirmed the antimicrobial properties of crude root exudates of Kernza®, as well as individual metabolites such as caffeic acid, vanillic acid, vanillin, and phenylalanine. Soil incubation experiments further demonstrated the nitrification inhibition potential of all tested metabolites, except phenylalanine. This study presents the initial evidence elucidating the mechanisms by which Kernza® regulates nitrification and clarifies the function of Kernza’s® metabolome in mediating nitrification inhibition. In the second study, a pairwise combinatorial approach was employed to assess the interactions among biochemically distinct metabolites co-exuded by Kernza® – caffeic acid, vanillic acid, vanillin, and phenylalanine – against multiple ammonia-oxidisers and soil nitrification. It was found that the metabolites interacted both synergistically and antagonistically against the test strains and soil nitrification, with antagonism being the most predominant interaction among the metabolites. Caffeic acid exhibited single agent dominance (SAD), dominating all other metabolites in all combinations. Furthermore, nitrifiers responded differentially to the metabolites – affirming that nitrifiers are differentially sensitive to inhibitors. Both individual and paired metabolites inhibited the growth of multiple AOB and AOA, as well as soil nitrification – suggesting that both synergism and antagonism did not impair the inhibitory potentials of the metabolites. This evidence suggests that biochemically distinct metabolites exuded by Kernza® and other BNI-positive plants may be interacting in diverse ways in the rhizosphere to suppress nitrification. The third study assessed the impact of Kernza®-induced perennialization on rhizomicrobiome and root endophytes in comparison to annual wheat under an agroclimatic gradient (Sweden, France, and Belgium). The results suggest pronounced similarities in the rhizobacterial composition of Kernza® and annual wheat, with no significant difference in the alpha diversity of their rhizomicrobiome. Beta diversity analysis revealed that factors such as country (agroclimatic conditions), sampling depth (spatial), and year (temporal) rather exerted greater influence than crop type. Notwithstanding, Kernza® promoted the stability of the rhizomicrobiome than annual wheat based on year-on-year comparison – suggesting that perennialization has the ability to protect rhizomicrobiome from ecological perturbation. Moreover, Kernza® recruited and internalised a higher proportion of the rhizosphere microbiome into its root tissues compared to annual wheat, indicating a potential role of crop-associated microbiomes in the lifecycle of Kernza®. Furthermore, an environment-wide comparison with agroecologically relevant database revealed that Kernza®, compared to annual wheat, harboured a significant proportion of rhizobacterial taxa associated with the rhizosphere and grassland ecosystems – supporting the notion that Kernza® shares ecological characteristics with natural grasslands. This study adds to the growing body of knowledge on the rhizosphere ecology of Kernza® and provides further evidence for the ecosystem service potential of Kernza®.