Browsing by Subject "Integrated weed management"
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Publication Bi‐directional hoeing in maize(2023) Naruhn, Georg; Schneevoigt, Valentin; Hartung, Jens; Peteinatos, Gerassimos; Möller, Kurt; Gerhards, RolandThe weed control efficacy (WCE) of mechanical weeding in the inter‐row area in conventional cropping systems can achieve more than 90%. Despite the use of special intra‐row tools (e.g., finger weeders), only a WCE of 65%–75% can currently be realized in the intra‐row area. To close the gap between inter‐row and intra‐row WCE, in this study, a new approach for high‐efficacy precise mechanical weeding is presented. By using a GPS‐based pneumatic precision seeder (Kverneland GEOseed), a square crop seeding pattern of 37.5 cm × 37.5 cm was established in maize to enable post‐emergence hoeing lengthwise and transverse to the sowing direction. Thus, the treated area by the hoeing blades is postulated to increase, resulting in higher WCE. For this, six field experiments were conducted in South‐Western Germany in 2021 and 2022. Goosefoot blades and no‐till sweeps were guided automatically using a camera for row detection and a hydraulic side‐shift control for the hoe. This bi‐directional treatment was compared to an herbicide application and to hoeing treatments only along and transverse to the sowing direction. The bi‐directional hoeing treatment increased the WCE compared to hoeing along the crop rows on average from 80% to 95% and was not significantly different from the herbicide applications in 2022. Precise sowing in combination with hoeing along and transverse the crop rows resulted in 5.3% crop losses compared to 2.2% for hoeing only along the sowing direction by using only 15 cm wide goosefoot blades, while in the herbicide treatment and the untreated control no crop losses were detected. While maize biomass was not significantly different from the herbicide treatment in most cases over both years, in 2022, even the grain yield of the bi‐directional hoeing treatment with goosefoot blades (7.8 Mg ha−1) was statistically equal to the herbicide treatment (6.9 Mg ha−1). This study demonstrates the great potential of bi‐directional hoeing as an effective alternative to chemical weed control in row crops such as maize, sunflower and sugar beet.Publication Camera-guided weed hoeing in winter cereals with narrow row distance(2020) Gerhards, Roland; Kollenda, Benjamin; Machleb, Jannis; Möller, Kurt; Butz, Andreas; Reiser, David; Griegentrog, Hans-WernerFarmers are facing severe problems with weed competition in cereal crops. Grass-weeds and perennial weed species became more abundant in Europe mainly due to high percentages of cereal crops in cropping systems and reduced tillage practices combined with continuous applications of herbicides with the same mode of action. Several weed populations have evolved resistance to herbicides. Precision weed hoeing may help to overcome these problems. So far, weed hoeing in cereals was restricted to cropping practices with row distances of more than 200 mm. Hoeing in cereals with conventional row distances of 125–170 mm requires the development of automatic steering systems. The objective of this project was to develop a new automatic guidance system for inter-row hoeing using camera-based row detection and automatic side-shift control. Six field studies were conducted in winter wheat to investigate accuracy, weed control efficacy and crop yields of this new hoeing technology. A three-meter prototype and a 6-meter segmented hoe were built and tested at three different speeds in 150 mm seeded winter wheat. The maximum lateral offset from the row center was 22.53 mm for the 3 m wide hoe and 18.42 mm for the 6 m wide hoe. Camera-guided hoeing resulted in 72–96% inter-row and 21–91% intra-row weed control efficacy (WCE). Weed control was 7–15% higher at 8 km h−1 compared to 4 km h−1. WCE could be increased by 14–22% when hoeing was combined with weed harrowing. Grain yields after camera-guided hoeing at 8 km h−1 were 15–76% higher than the untreated control plots and amounted the same level as the weed-free herbicide plots. The study characterizes camera-guided hoeing in cereals as a robust and effective method of weed control.Publication Exploring the effects of different stubble tillage practices and glyphosate application combined with the new soil residual herbicide cinmethylin against Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. in winter wheat(2022) Messelhäuser, Miriam Hannah; Saile, Marcus; Sievernich, Bernd; Gerhards, RolandEffective control of Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. (blackgrass) solely with a chemical treatment is not guaranteed anymore because populations exhibit resistance to almost all herbicide modes of action. Integrated weed management (IWM) against blackgrass is necessary to maintain high weed control efficacies in winter cereals. Four field experiments were conducted in Southwest Germany from 2018 to 2020 to control A. myosuroides with a combination of cultural and chemical methods. Stubble treatments, including flat, deep and inversion soil tillage; false seedbed preparation and glyphosate use, were combined with the application of the new pre-emergence herbicide cinmethylin in two rates in winter wheat. Average densities of A. myosuroides in the untreated control plots were up to 505 plants m−2. The combination of different stubble management strategies and the pre-emergence herbicide cinmethylin controlled 86–97% of A. myosuroides plants at the low rate and 95–100% at the high rate until 120 days after sowing. The different stubble tillage practices varied in their efficacy between trials and years. Most effective and consistent were pre-sowing glyphosate application on the stubble and stale seedbed preparation with a disc harrow. Stubble treatments increased winter wheat density in the first year but had no effect on crop density in the second year. Pre-emergence application of cinmethylin did not reduce winter wheat densities. Multiple tactics of weed control, including stubble treatments and pre-emergence application of cinmethylin, provided higher and more consistent control of A. myosuroides. Integration of cultural weed management could prevent the herbicide resistance development.Publication Incorporating agronomic measures into integrated weed management strategies using pre-emergence herbicide cinmethylin to control Alopecurus myosuroides Huds.(2022) Messelhäuser, Miriam; Gerhards, RolandAlopecurus myosuroides Huds. is one of the most problematic grass weeds in cereal production in Western Europe. This grass weed spread rapidly due to the repeated and intensive use of herbicides with the same mode of action and changes in arable cropping and tillage systems. Herbicide applications are the common agricultural practice for successful control of A. myosuroides due to its high flexibility and low cost. However, due to European and national restrictions and the growth of herbicide-resistant populations, farmers are forced to reduce herbicide use to minimize chemical impacts on the environment and food chain. As a holistic approach for reducing herbicide use, integrated weed management (IWM) is a diversification of the control strategy of A. myosuroides. In this thesis, several aspects of IWM were examined and combined to test for a successful A. myosuroides control strategy in winter cereals. Special attention was paid to cinmethylin, a pre-emergence herbicide with a new mode of action in winter cereals to control A. myosuroides. The first article comprised the development of an agar bioassay sensitivity test to determine sensitivity differences in A. myosuroides populations to pre-emergence herbicides containing flufenacet and the re-discovered substance cinmethylin. All of the tested populations did not show reduced sensitivity to cinmethylin, but differences in resistance factors were observed between the agar bioassay sensitivity test and the standard whole plant pot bioassay in the greenhouse. Nevertheless, it was possible for the most part to confirm the results for cinmethylin and flufenacet of the standardized greenhouse whole plant pot bioassay in the agar bioassay sensitivity tests and hence create a reliable, faster test system. The second article focused on cultural measures like cover crop mixtures, various stubble tillage methods and glyphosate treatments and their effect on total weed infestation in particular on A. mysouroides and volunteer wheat. Within two field experiments, the cover crop mixtures and the dual glyphosate application achieved a control efficacy of A. myosuroides of up to 100%, whereas stubble tillage and the single glyphosate treatment did not reduce A. myosuroides population significantly. The results demonstrated, that besides a double glyphosate application, well developed cover crop mixtures have a great ability for weed control, even for A. myosuroides. The third article also dealed with the combination of cultural measures (delayed seeding) and herbicide application and their influence on A. myosuroides control efficacy and yield response of winter wheat and triticale. Results indicate that cultural methods such as delayed seeding can reduce A. myosuroides populations up to 75%, although to achieve control efficacy of > 95%, supplementary herbicides should be used. In the fourth article, a two-year experiment on two experimental sites was set up with a special focus on stubble tillage methods, glyphosate application and the application of the pre-emergence herbicide cinmethylin in two rates. Control efficiencies of 99-100% were achieved by ploughing, double glyphosate application or via false seedbed preparation, each in combination with a cinmethylin application. In the last article, over a period of three years the new pre-emergence herbicide cinmethylin was tested in combination with stubble treatments and delayed drilling of winter annual cereals in winter wheat and winter triticale in Southwestern Germany. Cinmethylin controlled 58-99% of A. myosuroides plants until 120 days after sowing. Additive and synergistic effects of cinmethylin and delayed drilling were found for all studies. In this study, the focus was set on monitoring, cultural and direct weed control methods. Considering especially A. myosuroides, a diverse control strategy needs to be implemented to ensure a sustainable and reduced herbicide use, high control levels, minimized crop damage, safeguarded grain yields and reduced risk of resistance development. However, IWM measures imply increased system complexity, which may make their adoption by farmers difficult. Nevertheless, the results show that cinmethylin can be successfully used for weed control systems in combination with different stubble tillage methods, glyphosate application, delayed seeding, or herbicide sequences and mixtures, making it a valuable tool in integrated weed and resistance management strategies with its novel and unique mode of action.Publication Weed control in a pesticide‐free farming system with mineral fertilisers(2023) Saile, Marcus; Spaeth, Michael; Schwarz, Jürgen; Bahrs, Enno; Claß‐Mahler, Ingrid; Gerhards, RolandNegative impacts of pesticides on the environment and human health, the risk of pesticide residues in the food chain, and the problems with herbicide‐resistant weed biotypes support the need for alternative cropping systems. The objective of this study was to investigate weed populations, weed management and crop yield in a pesticide‐free cropping system with the use of mineral fertilisers. Conventional‐, organic‐ and mineral‐ecological cropping systems (MECS) with 6‐year crop rotations including winter wheat, maize, winter triticale or winter rye, soyabean or spring pea, and spring barley were established in a randomised complete strip plot design with four repetitions. Experiments were conducted at four locations in Germany. Preventive and sensor‐guided mechanical weed management strategies were applied in all crops in the organic system and in MECS. Herbicide were applied in the conventional farming system. Weed densities, weed species composition, weed control efficacy (WCE) and crop yield were analysed over 2 years in 2020 and 2021. Conventional farming had the highest WCE and 1–7 weeds m−2 (2.7% weed coverage) after herbicide application. In the organic cropping system and MECS, up to 27 weeds m−2 were counted after camera‐guided weed hoeing. Weed coverage in MECS (9.7%) was higher than in the organic cropping system with 7.7%. Crop yield in MECS was equal to the conventional farming system and 20% higher yield than in the organic farming system. MECS represents a promising new and productive cropping practice if an effective integrated weed management strategy is applied.