Browsing by Subject "Monetary policy"

Now showing 1 - 11 of 11

A behavioral macroeconomic model with endogenous boom-bust cycles and leverage dynamcis
(2011) Scheffknecht, Lukas; Geiger, Felix
We merge a financial market model with leverage-constrained, heterogeneous agents with a reduced-form version of the New-Keynesian standard model. Agents in both submodels are assumed to be boundedly rational. The financial market model produces endogenously arising boom-bust cycles. It is also capable to generate highly non-linear deleveraging processes, fire sales and ultimately a default scenario. Asset price booms are triggered via self-fulfilling prophecies. Asset price busts are induced by agents' choice of an increasingly fragile balance sheet structure during good times. Their vulnerability is inevitably revealed by small, randomly occurring shocks. Our transmission channel of financial market activity to the real sector embraces a recent strand of literature shedding light on the link between the active balance sheet management of financial market participants, the induced procyclical fluctuations of desired risk compensations and their final impact on the real economy. We show that a systematic central bank reaction on financial market developments dampens macroeconomic volatility considerably. Furthermore, restricting leverage in a countercyclical fashion limits the magnitude of financial cycles and hence their impact on the real economy.
Assessing uncertainty in Europe and the US : is there a common factor?
(2012) Sauter, Oliver
This paper aims an empirical investigation of uncertainty in the Euro Zone as well as the US. For this purpose I conduct a factor analysis of uncertainty measures starting in 2001 until the end of 2011. I use survey-based data provided by the ECB and the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia as well as the stock market indices VSTOXX and VIX, both measures of implied volatility of stock market movements. Each measure shows an increase in uncertainty during the last years marked by the financial turmoil. Given the rise in uncertainty, the question arises whether this uncertainty is driven by the same underlying factors. For the Euro Zone, I show that uncertainty can be separated into factors of short and long-term uncertainty. In the US there is a sharp distinction between uncertainty that drives stock market and ?real? variables on the one hand and inflation (short and long-term) on the other hand. Combining both data sets, factor analysis delivers (1) an international stock market factor, (2) a common European uncertainty factor and (3) an US-inflation uncertainty factor.
Deflationary vs. inflationary expectations : a new-Keynesian perspective with heterogeneous agents and monetary believes
(2009) Sauter, Oliver; Geiger, Felix
We expand a standard New-Keynesian model by allowing for a special role of money in the inflation and expectations building process. Motivated by the two-pillar Phillips curve, we introduce heterogeneous expectations. Thereby a fraction of agents forms inflation expectations by observing trend money growth. We show that in the presence of these monetary believers, contractive shocks to the economy produce smoother dynamics for inflation and output. We also find that monetary policy should follow a conventional Taylor rule with contemporaneous inflation and output data, if it is uncertain about the fraction of monetary believers.
How the ECB and the US fed set interest rates
(2006) Polleit, Thorsten; Belke, Ansgar
Monetary policies of the ECB and US Fed can be characterised by ?Taylor rules?, that is both central banks seem to be setting rates by taking into account the ?output gap? and inflation. We also set up and tested Taylor rules which incorporate money growth and the euro-dollar exchange rate, thereby improving the ?fit? between actual and Taylor rule based rates. In general, Taylor rules appear to be a much better way of describing Fed policy than ECB policy. Simulations suggest that the ECB?s short-term interest rates have been at a much lower level in the last two years compared with what a Taylor rule would suggest.
Interest rate policy and supply-side adjustment dynamics
(2010) Schmid, Kai Daniel; Kienzler, Daniel
In contrast to the present consensus view of stabilization policy, theoretical and empirical research strongly support the consideration of supply-side adjustment to pronounced variations of factor-utilization in order to trace a more realistic pattern of macroeconomic adjustment dynamics within simulation studies. Against this background, our paper seeks to illuminate the relevance of endogenous supply-side adjustment for monetary policy research. We modify a basic New Keynesian model by explicitly considering demand-side stimulus on the evolution of productive capacity and analyze stability, impulse response, and welfare issues if the central bank follows a simple monetary policy rule. Thereby, we control for the robustness of our policy implications by various states of output gap mismeasurement the central bank might be confronted with. We find that, in contrast to a basic New Keynesian Model, output gap stabilization plays a more prominent role when potential output is endogenous.
International digital currencies and their impact on monetary policy : an exploration of implications and vulnerability
(2019) Proettel, Thorsten
The objective of this discussion paper is to explore the consequences for monetary policy from the establishment of an international digital currency modeled like Libra. For this purpose, a basic assessment of the behavior of economic agents is conducted and possible conflicts with monetary policy are analyzed. Furthermore, a simple approach is developed to estimate the nature and extent of vulnerability for 42 currencies. The results suggest that currencies from developing countries and from developed nations are vulnerable in different ways. In the end, a stronger convergence of central bank policies could result. Thus, the introduction of an international digital currency represents a turning point for monetary policy.
Langfristige Neutralität der Geldpolitik?
(2010) Schmid, Kai Daniel; Spahn, Peter
Macroeconomic theory often strictly separates cyclical analysis from trend analysis. Whereas the former is identified as the short-run phenomenon of a varying capacity utilization, the latter is understood as the long-run problem of economic growth that predominantly focuses on the evolution of basic growth factors, such as the supply of labour and technical progress, and disregards problems of macroeconomic stability. In particular, the consequences of monetary policy actions are modeled nonneutral in the short run but neutral in the long run. Policy implications of the present consensus view of stabilization policy depend on specific assumptions with regard to the equilibrium level of production. Thereby, the interpretation of equilibrium output rests on a separation of supply-side and demand-side adjustment to macroeconomic shocks promoting a dichotomy of short-term and long-term macrodynamics. For the present consensus model of macroeconomic stabilization policy this dichotomy represents one of the basic conceptual features. As non-neutrality is limited to the short run - interest rate policy affects aggregate demand and enables the central bank to target inflation - the system does not face a trade-off between real and nominal variables in the long run. The possibility that monetary policy actions may induce real effects that exceed short-term dynamics has been rarely discussed in mainstream economic literature and consequently has gained little attention in the discussion of monetary policy?s stabilization strategies. However, such a strict separation between short-term (generally associated with demand-side) and long-term (supply-side) macrodynamics not only provokes concern from the stance of basic insights of the theories of economic growth. Rather one has to argue that significant changes of capacity utilization that last over several periods may induce procyclical supply-side adjustments. For this reason, several economists raise severe concerns with regard to the corresponding model-setups described above. In fact, the (over-)simplification of an extensively exogenous evolution of productive capacity on the one hand and the mechanisms of procyclical adjustment of production factors on the other hand reveal a strong macrotheoretical tension. There are several channels that promote procyclical stimulus of aggregate demand and a changing factor utilization to the accumulation and efficiency of an economy?s productive capacity. Changing investment dynamics not only lead to quantitative adjustments of the capital stock, but also stimulate multifactor productivity through technical progress. Moreover, unemployment may forward the emergence of long-term unemployment and reduce the effective supply of labor by mechanisms of labor market hysteresis. This clearly weakens the conventional agreement of a trend-cycle-dichotomy which still plays a central role within the context of models that are used for stabilization analysis. Moreover, the theoretical considerations are supported by empirical findings that provide strong clues for procyclical evolution of productive capacity. Against the background of asymmetric factor utilization due to nominal divergence and the resulting differences in real interest rates EMU-members reflect clear differences with regard to the utilization and accumulation of production factors. As alternating stimuli of aggregate demand and supply support the view that the long-term development of an economy cannot be understood without its short-term outcomes, stabilization policy that is supposed to be nonneutral in the short run will exhibit long-term effects with regard to output and employment. The impact of a changing factor utilization on the accumulation and efficiency of production factors motivates path dependency and the existence of multiple equilibria. As cyclical movements of aggregate demand play a decisive role for the evolution of an economy?s productive capacity stability and uniqueness of long-term equlibria as a system?s point of return become uncertain. In particular, output gaps close not only via the shift of aggregate demand but also due to the procyclical adjustment of potential output. Although there seem to be strong arguments in favor of procyclical adjustment of potential capacity to variations in aggregate demand, monetary policy may not frivolously exploit supply?s elasticity for expansionary stimulus. This is not only due to the fact that supply-side adjustment limits itself to certain ranges but also the evolution of inflation expectations may reduce the reflationary scope. On the other hand, the long-term costs of pronounced underutilization highlight the asymmetric quality of stabilization impulses that seem to be disregarded within ordinary loss functions.
Medium-run macrodynamics and the consensus view of stabilization policy
(2010) Schmid, Kai Daniel
Policy implications of the present consensus view of stabilization policy depend on specific assumptions with regard to the equilibrium level of production. Thereby, the interpretation of equilibrium output rests on a separation of supply-side and demandside adjustment to macroeconomic shocks promoting a dichotomy of short-term and long-term macrodynamics. In contrast to this, there are several channels that promote procyclical stimulus of aggregate demand and a changing factor utilization to the accumulation and efficiency of an economy?s productive capacity. Medium-run macrodynamics call for a rather endogenous explanation of production capacity and challenge the uniqueness of long-term equilibria.
Monetary policy and systemic risk on financial markets : concepts, transmission channels and policy implications
(2016) Scheffknecht, Lukas; Spahn, Peter
The present thesis explores the issue of systemic risk on financial markets and its interplay with monetary policy. Systemic risk is defined as the risk of experiencing a severe financial crisis. It is inefficiently high in the absence of appropriate regulation due to the presence of systemic externalities, which arise if financial institutions do not internalize the consequences of their actions for systemic stability. More specifically, such behavior may lead to vulnerable financial networks, poor diversification, fire sales, inefficient distribution of liquidity as well as to breakdowns of markets characterized by incomplete information. Macroprudential regulation aiming at systemic stability should therefore focus on the mitigation of systemic externalities. However, a critical assessment of the current state of financial regulation reveals that several important drivers of systemic risk remain unaddressed. Insufficient containment of systemic risk poses a challenge for monetary policy. First, financial crises have adverse effects on macroeconomic stability. Second, monetary policy itself has the potential to affect the evolution of systemic risk. It is subsequently tried to shed light on potential transmission channels running from an expansive policy stance to an increase in systemic risk. On a theoretical basis, it is found that a monetary expansion tends to induce higher leverage as well as credit risk and less stable refinancing in the intermediation sector. An empirical analysis of the US economy based on vector autoregressions supports this “risk-taking channel.” Moreover, the analysis of a simple macro-financial model shows that procyclical risk-taking behavior of financial intermediaries produces additional macroeconomic volatility. Optimal policy consists of a combination of strict capital requirements and an interest rate rule featuring an explicit reaction to credit dynamics. In a final step, I discuss implications for monetary policy. If macroprudential regulation is not strict enough, it is advisable to embark on a strategy of preemptive interest rate hikes in an environment of rising systemic risk. Its implementation could be achieved by a slight modification of the existing two-pillar strategy of the European Central Bank. Alternatively, central banks could rely on output gap measures which take financial conditions into account. However, such a strategy can increase short-term macroeconomic volatility. Hence, monetary policy faces the additional trade-off of balancing medium-term financial stability against macroeconomic stability in the short run. Moreover, monetary policy and macroprudential regulation should be carefully coordinated to deliver welfare-maximizing outcomes.
Money and inflation : lessons from the US for ECB monetary policy
(2007) Polleit, Thorsten; Belke, Ansgar
We turn our attention to the role of money for determining nominal magnitudes. Using US data, we find that the aggregate ?nominal output plus and stock market capitalisation? is closely related to the money stock, lending support to one of Milton Friedman?s key monetarist propositions. This finding should be particularly important for ECB monetary policy: an inflation-free euro plays a crucial role for European economic and political integration. We conclude that monetary policy must keep a very close eye on money supply if it wants to prevent consumer and asset price inflation.
The camp view of inflation forecasts
(2009) Schmid, Kai Daniel; Sauter, Oliver; Geiger, Felix
Analyzing sample moments of survey forecasts, we derive disagreement and un- certainty measures for the short- and medium term inflation outlook. The latter provide insights into the development of inflation forecast uncertainty in the context of a changing macroeconomic environment since the beginning of 2008. Motivated by the debate on the role of monetary aggregates and cyclical variables describing a Phillips-curve logic, we develop a macroeconomic indicator spread which is assumed to drive forecasters? judgments. Empirical evidence suggests procyclical dynamics between disagreement among forecasters, individual forecast uncertainty and the macro-spread. We call this approach the camp view of inflation forecasts and show that camps form up whenever the spread widens.