Browsing by Subject "Wasserschutzgebiet"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1

Die Auswirkungen einer einmalig variierten Bodenbearbeitung auf Ertragsbildung, Verunkrautung und Bodennitratgehalt unter ökologischen Produktionsbedingungen
(2007) Häberle, Annette; Claupein, Wilhelm
Although organic farming is a very non-polluting kind of agriculture, nitrate leachate losses can also be found under this management. Restrictions in organic fertilization have the purpose to keep the nitrate leachate with soil tillage and crop rotation on a low level. Due to this aim field experiments were conducted to investigate the short-term effect of timing and method of cultivation after the harvest of legumes and crops with high-N crop residues on N mineralization, nitrate leaching, crop growth, diseases and weeds in wheat crops. The study was designed to compare the effects of the ?Schutz- und Ausgleichsverordnung? (SchALVO) in Baden-Württemberg and tillage strategies which are normally used in practice, like reduced and conventional tillage in autumn and to compare different times of conventional tillage in winter and spring in three different areas of Baden-Württemberg with typically soil types. The areas were located in the Main-Tauber-Kreis with soils from Keuper and shell lime, in the Gäu-Region with soils from löss and the Schwäbische Alb with soils of limestone. Especially organic farms use, for the admancement of yield und for the regulation of weed population, a timely and increased requirement of soil tillage. In the results of October 2002 till summer 2005 there was no significant influence of timing and method of cultivation, for example reduced tillage in autumn or tillage in winter or spring, on the productivity of organic farms. In the most cases the conditions on the experimental fields were very good resulting of a low weed density and a good farming management. On fields with a high density of perennial weeds the risk of multiplication of weed population persists even after a short-term variation of tillage. There were only a few, not significant differences in the development of wheat growth because of different soil tillage. The most differences were seen between the growth of winter wheat and summer wheat. The yield of summer wheat was not significantly lower than the yield of winter wheat. Summer wheat reached nearly the same yield potential with higher amounts of crude protein. Especially in areas with strong winters and low N-input the yield of summer wheat was higher than the yield of winter wheat. Because of a second peak of mineralization in spring there was a better adaptation of NO3-release to the growth of summer wheat after soil tillage in November, December and February. Because of the better utilization of soil-N from summer wheat the lower yield potential in comparison to winter wheat was relativised in the most areas. With regard to N mineralization a time displacement of soil tillage in winter or spring didnt reduce the N-mineralization before winter in all cases. But in this time displaced treatments there was a second peak in N-mineralization additional to the first peak in autumn. Short-term practice of reduced soil tillage did not reduce N-release in the field experiments. Altogether a time displaced soil tillage in winter or spring could be, based on the experiments, a practical alternative for N-conservation through winter with regard to N-mineralization as well as with regard to corn yield. With the cultivation of a fast-growing catch crop farmers could reach an additional reduction of mineralised N amount over winter. In the farming practice a well timed sowing of catch crops is not always possible, like it is shown in the experiments, but it should be kept in mind for N conservation.