Browsing by Subject "Weed resistance"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1

Untersuchung alternativer Unkrautmanagementsysteme für Kulturraps unter Einbeziehung von Möglichkeiten zur Reduzierung des Auftretens von Raps als Durchwuchs
(2022) Schwabe, Sebastian; Claupein, Wilhelm
Oilseed rape is the worlds second most important oil crop after soybeans. In the course of the European Green Deal of the European Union and the associated stronger promotion of renewable energies in the future, it can be assumed that the importance of oilseed rape cultivation will continue to increase. Due to the price pressure on conventional farms in Germany, cultivation systems have been changed from an economic point of view, partly to the detriment of sustainability. As a re-sult, crop rotations often consist of a few monetarily profitable crops and the proportion of spring crops in the crop rotation is reduced. Oilseed rape cultivation is attractive from an economic point of view, and its share in the crop rotation has been increased. The intensity of tillage and mechanical weed control has been reduced. The weed control success is strongly dependent on the effectiveness of numerically limited herbicidal active agents. Due to monotonous crop rotations and the lower tillage intensity, certain weed species are pro-moted more strongly, while at the same time these are controlled with only a few herbicid-al active agents. Adapted, difficult-to-control, and in some cases herbicide-resistant weed populations develop. For this reason, the purpose of this thesis is to evaluate alternative weed management systems in oilseed rape, while also investigating options for prophylac-tic prevention of the emergence of volunteer oilseed rape as a weed in crop rotation. The objectives of this thesis were: (i) To evaluate the feasibility of hoeing as a mechanical weed control method and the application of the Clearfield® system in oilseed rape as a comparison to common, field herbicide strategies. (ii) To focus on the volunteer oilseed rape issue. Volunteers resulting from Clearfield® oilseed rape are more difficult to control chemically in subsequent crops due to inherited herbicide tolerance. The potential of differ-ent seed treatments in oilseed rape to reduce the development of secondary dormancy, and therefore seed persistence in the soil and the volunteer oilseed rape issue, was investigat-ed. Following these objectives, several field and laboratory experiments were conducted to generate data for three published scientific papers. Paper I: A two-year field trial was conducted to evaluate the performance of the Clearfield® system in oilseed rape under different management intensities compared to a more com-monly used pre-emergence herbicide system. The Clearfield® system is an alternative weed management system for oilseed rape. It is a combination of a broad-spectrum post-emergence herbicide and a Clearfield® oilseed rape variety that has tolerance to the herbi-cide. This tolerance was implemented in Clearfield® oilseed rape varieties through conven-tional, non-GM breeding techniques. Clearfield® herbicides have lethal effects on non-Clearfield® oilseed rape varieties. Paper II: An investigation was made through laboratory and field trials on the effect of ger-mination-promoting substances (nutrients and gibberellic acid) on the development of sec-ondary dormancy of oilseed rape seeds and on their persistence in the soil. Paper III: In a three-year field trial, hoeing as a weed control method was compared with a commonly used herbicide strategy. The hypotheses made in the introduction were both confirmed and refuted by the findings obtained in the trials. Hypotheses stated in paper I: (i) The Clearfield® herbicide and herbicides of a common practice pre-emergence strategy show similar efficiencies; (ii) Management intensity has an effect on weed density but does not affect yield; (iii) Herbicide strategy does not affect yield. At higher management intensities, both herbicide systems achieved comparable efficien-cies. At lower management intensities, especially in terms of seeding density and tillage, weeds were less efficiently controlled with the Clearfield®-system, and yields were par-tially lower. At higher management intensities, higher yields and lower weed emergence were observed compared to lower intensities, presumably due to better weed control by plowing and more favorable emergence conditions due to a higher tillage intensity. Hypotheses stated in paper II: (i) All tested substances reduce the induction of secondary dormancy; (ii) the tested sub-stances reduce the induction of secondary dormancy to different extents; (iii) the tested substances have an effect on the induction of secondary dormancy, regardless of whether the tested oilseed rape seeds originate from varieties with a high or low tendency, to devel-op secondary dormancy; (iv) if a variety tends to develop high secondary dormancy, its in-duction is reduced to a greater extent by the tested substances than in seeds from a variety with a low tendency to develop secondary dormancy. Most of the tested substances reduced both the induction of secondary dormancy and the survivability of oilseed rape seeds. The efficiency of the reduction depended on the type of substance and the oilseed rape variety. Substances containing gibberellic acid proved most effective, followed by micronutrient treatments and potassium nitrate. Hypotheses stated in paper III: (i) Hoeing achieves the same weed control efficiency as herbicides; (ii) regardless of whether herbicides or hoeing are used as weed control, the same oilseed rape yield can be realized. Weed biomass was higher compared to herbicide application when hoeing was used as a weed control measure. This is probably due to the weather-dependent efficiency of hoe-ing and its only partial surface applicability. Weeds emerging in or close to the seed row cannot be controlled. Nevertheless, no yield differences were found between hoeing as a weed control measure and pure chemical weed control. The competitive strength of the varieties used was most likely large enough to ensure this yield stability. Both hoeing and applying the Clearfield® system under higher management intensities re-sulted in similarly high oilseed rape yields compared to conventional herbicide strategies, although weed control efficiency was lower. As long as no hard-to-control weeds occur on a conventional farm and a common herbicide strategy effectively controls existing weeds, changing the weed management system is less beneficial. Because the Clearfield® system increases selection pressure on weeds, the occurrence of weed herbicide resistance be-comes more likely. In addition, Clearfield® volunteer canola is more difficult to control chemically in subsequent crops. Hoeing efficiency is weather dependent, weeds are only captured between rows, and area performance is lower. However, when difficult-to-control weeds increasingly minimize the efficiency of existing, conventional chemical control strategies, both hoeing and the use of the Clearfield® system in combination with a common herbicide strategy can expand weed control options and in-crease their efficiencies. When applying the Clearfield® system, strategies should be em-ployed to minimize the occurrence of Clearfield® volunteer oilseed rape in subsequent crops. It has been shown in this thesis that germination-promoting compounds, particularly gib-berellic acid, prevent the induction of secondary dormancy, as well as the ability of oilseed rape seeds to persist, and therefore, have the theoretical potential to contribute to a reduc-tion in the volunteer oilseed rape occurrence problem. Overall, both hoeing and the application of the Clearfield® system as alternative weed man-agement systems can usefully complement established methods of weed control in oilseed rape, where necessary. In addition, the use of germination-promoting compounds in oilseed rape seeds has demonstrated the theoretical potential to contribute to a reduction of volun-teer oilseed rape as a weed in crop rotations.