A new version of this entry is available:

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
ResearchPaper
2019

Relative consumption, relative wealth, and long-run growth : when and why is the standard analysis prone to erroneous conclusions?

Institute of Economics

Abstract (English)

We employ a novel approach for analyzing the effects of relative consumption and relative wealth preferences on both the decentralized and the socially optimal economic growth rates. In the pertinent literature these effects are usually assessed by examining the dependence of the growth rates on the two parameters of the instantaneous utility function that seem to measure the strength of the relative consumption and the relative wealth motive. We go beyond the sole consideration of parameters by revealing the fundamental factors that ultimately determine long-run growth. In doing so we identify widely used types of status preferences in which the traditional approach is prone to erroneous conclusions. For example, in one of these specifications the parameter that seems to determine the strength of the relative consumption motive actually also affects the strength of the relative wealth motive and the elasticity of intertemporal substitution.

File is subject to an embargo until

This is a new version of:

Notes

Publication license

Publication series

Hohenheim discussion papers in business, economics and social sciences; 2019,12

Published in

Faculty
Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences
Institute
Institute of Economics

Examination date

Supervisor

Edition / version

Citation

DOI

ISSN

ISBN

Language
English

Publisher

Publisher place

Classification (DDC)
330 Economics

Original object

BibTeX

@techreport{Prettner2019, url = {https://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/6456}, author = {Prettner, Klaus and Hof, Franz X.}, title = {Relative consumption, relative wealth, and long-run growth : when and why is the standard analysis prone to erroneous conclusions?}, year = {2019}, school = {Universität Hohenheim}, series = {Hohenheim discussion papers in business, economics and social sciences}, }