Breeding progress of grain and forage maize in long-term variety trials compared to on-farm yield development

dc.contributor.authorFeike, T.
dc.contributor.authorBrandes, H.
dc.contributor.authorPiepho, H-P.
dc.contributor.corporateFeike, T.; Julius Kühn Institute – Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Strategies and Technology Assessment, Stahnsdorfer Damm 81, 14532, Kleinmachnow, Germany
dc.contributor.corporateBrandes, H.; Bundessortenamt, Osterfelddamm 60, 30627, Hannover, Germany
dc.contributor.corporatePiepho, H-P.; Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstrasse 23, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-27T07:53:02Z
dc.date.available2026-03-27T07:53:02Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.date.updated2026-01-23T14:04:22Z
dc.description.abstractMaize cultivation increased significantly in Germany over the past 25 years. With a share of over 20% of arable land, maize has become the second most important crop after wheat, primarily due to the growing demand for biogas production. Based on long-term variety trials for grain and forage maize, we quantified breeding progress applying mixed linear models extended by linear and nonlinear regression terms to estimate time trends between 1987 and 2023. Grain yield increased by 33.4 dt ha −1 (36.3%) and dry matter yield of forage maize by 36.1 dt ha −1 (19.9%) compared to 1987. Over the last 15 years, there has been a slowdown in upward yield trends. In addition, the NUE of grain and forage maize increased by 35.0% and 27.2%, respectively. From 1987 to 2023, grain yield gaps between variety trials and national on-farm yields reduced from 30.1 to 22.6% while the stagnation of on-farm forage maize yields resulted in an increased yield gap from 15.1 to 32.1%. This diverging trend can be attributed to a complex set of reasons, such as climate change, management practices and economic constraints. Looking at quality traits in the variety trials, starch content and digestibility of forage maize did not change, but starch yield (14.0%) and NUE of starch yield (18.3%) increased, while N yield of forage maize decreased by − 4.7%, though not significant. Our study shows that breeding progress of grain maize was successfully transferred into increasing on-farm yields, while a considerable yield gap remains for forage maize, what calls for additional research.en
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
dc.description.sponsorshipBMEL
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversität Hohenheim (3153)
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-025-05085-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/18845
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.licensecc_by
dc.subject.ddc630
dc.titleBreeding progress of grain and forage maize in long-term variety trials compared to on-farm yield developmenten
dc.type.diniArticle
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTheoretical and applied genetics, 138 (2025), 12, 303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-025-05085-6. ISSN: 1432-2242 Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber303
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issn1432-2242
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issue12
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleTheoretical and applied genetics
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameSpringer Berlin Heidelberg
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplaceBerlin/Heidelberg
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume138
local.export.bibtex@article{Feike2025, doi = {10.1007/s00122-025-05085-6}, author = {Feike, T. and Brandes, H. and Piepho, H-P. et al.}, title = {Breeding progress of grain and forage maize in long-term variety trials compared to on-farm yield development}, journal = {Theoretical and Applied Genetics}, year = {2025}, volume = {138}, number = {12}, }
local.subject.sdg2
local.subject.sdg12
local.title.fullBreeding progress of grain and forage maize in long-term variety trials compared to on-farm yield development

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
00122_2025_Article_5085.pdf
Size:
6.36 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
supp.zip
Size:
235.89 KB
Format:
Unknown data format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
7.85 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: