Benchmarking of secure group communication schemes with focus on IoT
| dc.contributor.author | Prantl, Thomas | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bauer, André | |
| dc.contributor.author | Engel, Simon | |
| dc.contributor.author | Horn, Lukas | |
| dc.contributor.author | Krupitzer, Christian | |
| dc.contributor.author | Iffländer, Lukas | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kounev, Samuel | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-27T07:39:49Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-02-27T07:39:49Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2025-06-18T14:19:07Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | As Internet of Things (IoT) devices become ubiquitous, they face increasing cybersecurity threats. Unlike standard 1-to-1 communication, the unique challenge posed by n-to-n communication in IoT is that messages must not be encrypted for a single recipient but for a group of recipients. For this reason, using Secure Group Communication (SGC) schemes is necessary to encrypt n-to-n communication efficiently for large group sizes. To this end, the literature presents various SGC schemes with varying features, performance profiles, and architectures, making the selection process challenging. A selection from this multitude of SGC schemes should best be made based on a benchmark that provides an overview of the performance of the schemes. Such a benchmark would make it much easier for developers to select an SGC scheme, but such a benchmark still needs to be created. This paper aims to close this gap by presenting a benchmark for SGC schemes that focus on IoT. Since the design of a benchmark first requires the definition of the underlying business problems, we defined suitable problems for using SGC schemes in the IoT sector as the first step. We identified a common problem for the centralized and decentralized/hybrid SGC schemes, whereas the distributed/contributory SGC schemes required defining an independent business problem. Based on these business problems, we first designed a specification-based benchmark, which we then extended to a hybrid benchmark through corresponding implementations. Finally, we deployed our hybrid benchmark in a typical IoT environment and measured and compared the performance of different SGC schemes. Our findings reveal notable impacts on calculation times and storage requirements without a trusted Central Instance (CI) in distributed/contributory SGC schemes. | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/s44248-024-00010-6 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/17835 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.rights.license | cc_by | |
| dc.subject | Secure Group Communication scheme | |
| dc.subject | Benchmark | |
| dc.subject | IoT security | |
| dc.subject | Group key agreement | |
| dc.subject.ddc | 000 | |
| dc.title | Benchmarking of secure group communication schemes with focus on IoT | en |
| dc.type.dini | Article | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Discover data, 2 (2024), 1, 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44248-024-00010-6. ISSN: 2731-6955 Cham : Springer International Publishing | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber | 5 | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issn | 2731-6955 | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issue | 1 | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle | Discover data | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername | Springer International Publishing | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplace | Cham | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume | 2 | |
| local.export.bibtex | @article{Prantl2024, doi = {10.1007/s44248-024-00010-6}, author = {Prantl, Thomas and Bauer, André and Engel, Simon et al.}, title = {Benchmarking of Secure Group Communication schemes with focus on IoT}, journal = {Discover Data}, year = {2024}, volume = {2}, number = {1}, } | |
| local.subject.sdg | 9 | |
| local.subject.sdg | 16 | |
| local.title.full | Benchmarking of Secure Group Communication schemes with focus on IoT | |
| local.university.bibliography | https://hohcampus.verw.uni-hohenheim.de/qisserver/a/fs.res.frontend/pub/view/44523 |
