Achtung: hohPublica wurde am 18.11.2024 aktualisiert. Falls Sie auf Darstellungsfehler stoßen, löschen Sie bitte Ihren Browser-Cache (Strg + Umschalt + Entf). *** Attention: hohPublica was last updated on November 18, 2024. If you encounter display errors, please delete your browser cache (Ctrl + Shift + Del).
 

A new version of this entry is available:

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Article
2023

Multi‐scale dough adhesion analysis: Relation between laboratory scale, pilot scale and human sensory

Abstract (English)

Undesired dough adhesion is still a challenge during the production of baked goods. There are various methods for determining the adhesive texture properties of dough. In the majority of scientific papers, dough stickiness is measured analytically by the force‐distance recording of dough detachment. In this study, we describe a new multi‐scale approach to compare dough adhesion phenomena in a laboratory, pilot sale and human sensory assessment. In it, the adhesive material properties of dough were investigated using a pilot scale toppling device representing dough adhesion behavior in the production process, in the laboratory by texture analysis with the Chen–Hoseney method and furthermore with a new, implemented non‐oral human sensory analysis. To simulate different dough adhesion behavior, the dough mechanical and adhesion properties were varied by applying dough‐modifying enzymes and different dough storage times. The structural changes in the different wheat dough system were compared by rheological characterization. By characterizing the different adhesion phenomena of the doughs, the sample with bacterial xylanase showed the highest values after 80 min of storage time in all three methods. Correlation analysis revealed a strong relationship between the detachment time (pilot scale) and human sensory assessment attributes (Force R = 0.81, Time R = 0.87, Distance R = 0.92, Stickiness R = 0.80) after 80 min of storage time. Even though human sensory assessment showed limits in the detectability of differences in dough adhesion behavior compared to the Chen–Hoseney method, it was better suited to predict machinability.

File is subject to an embargo until

This is a correction to:

A correction to this entry is available:

This is a new version of:

Notes

Publication license

Publication series

Published in

Journal of texture studies, 54 (2023), 2, 222-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtxs.12745. ISSN: 1745-4603
Faculty
Institute

Examination date

Supervisor

Edition / version

Citation

DOI

ISSN

ISBN

Language
English

Publisher

Publisher place

Classification (DDC)
660 Chemical engineerin

Original object

Standardized keywords (GND)

Sustainable Development Goals

BibTeX

@article{Vogt2023, url = {https://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/16268}, doi = {10.1111/jtxs.12745}, author = {Vogt, Ulrike Therese and Kwak, Ju Eun and Fahmy, Ahmed Raouf et al.}, title = {Multi‐scale dough adhesion analysis: Relation between laboratory scale, pilot scale and human sensory}, journal = {Journal of texture studies}, year = {2023}, volume = {54}, number = {2}, }
Share this publication