Achtung: hohPublica wurde am 18.11.2024 aktualisiert. Falls Sie auf Darstellungsfehler stoßen, löschen Sie bitte Ihren Browser-Cache (Strg + Umschalt + Entf). *** Attention: hohPublica was last updated on November 18, 2024. If you encounter display errors, please delete your browser cache (Ctrl + Shift + Del).

Institut für Landwirtschaftliche Betriebslehre

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/16

Browse

Browsing Institut für Landwirtschaftliche Betriebslehre by Person "Blanck, Niklas"

Type the first few letters and click on the Browse button
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Steuerrechtliche Optionen und betriebswirtschaftliche Konsequenzen der interperiodischen Glättung von landwirtschaftlichen Einkünften
    (2012) Blanck, Niklas; Bahrs, Enno
    This thesis covers the potential introduction of income equalization deposits for German farmers. It provides a comprehensive overview of income equalization deposits regarding its legitimacy in German tax law, administrative constraints and the possibilities as well as the limits of income smoothing instruments in general. Furthermore, the economic effects on an on-farm level and consequences for the fiscal authorities are estimated. Due to an increasing variability in farm income, the German Farmers Association demanded the introduction of income equalization deposits in German tax law. Its aim is to avoid fluctuating incomes and to support farmers building reserve funds. The progressive income tax tariff leads to a progression-based extra tax load for annually fluctuating incomes compared to a constant year-to-year income. The income equalization deposit offers farmers the possibility to reduce their taxable income during successful years by creating untaxed reserves and accumulating cash in their own reserve fund. During less successful years, they are eligible to use the cash and have to pay tax on the so far untaxed reserves. This thesis explains the functionality and importance of untaxed reserves in general and the income equalization deposits for farmers in particular and examines their legitimacy according to German tax law. Untaxed reserves and other equalization instruments contradict the annual tax accounting period. Nevertheless there may be good reasons for their existence, e.g. the avoidance of undue hardship. Primary agricultural production is defined as the utilization of the natural resources of the soil to produce crops and raise livestock. This already suggests a special dependency on vagaries of nature. Constraints have to guarantee that the use of untaxed reserve is restricted to these special dependencies. Otherwise, equity in tax law is not preserved. Due to necessary constraints, which are in contrast with effectiveness and the achievement of objectives, a straight-forward use of income equalization deposits seems to be difficult. Therefore, income equalization deposits face the same difficulties like other equalization systems. The empirical survey uses data from approximately 5,300 farms from the German Farm Accountancy Data Network over a period of ten years. It evaluates the effectiveness of the existing two-year-average taxation for agricultural income in Germany (§ 4a EStG) and the additional use of the proposed income equalization deposit. Based on the income determination scheme, an optimization-algorithm calculates the maximal income smoothing effect for several farm typologies and estimates the effect for the fiscal authorities. The smoothing effect of the introduction of income equalization deposits turns out to be moderate compared to the existing two-year-average for farmers. The introduction of income equalization deposits does not contribute to the stabilization of farms in an appreciable extent. Necessary legal requirements and the administrative design may lead to the fact, that especially farmers, who have disposable cash and do not need any support, take advantage of the system. The construction of an effective system is in contrast with a design, which simultaneously meets all legal requirements. This divergences lead to the effect, that the beneficiaries of income equalization deposits are not congruent to the target group of an income equalization deposit. The empirical survey in combination with legal requirements and identified administrative difficulties leads to the conclusion, that the introduction of income equalization deposits in Germany does not seem to be necessary and other instruments of risk management should also be taken into account. In case income equalization deposits are introduced, essential requirements for its design and the design of income smoothing instruments in general have been elaborated.