Institut für Pflanzenzüchtung, Saatgutforschung und Populationsgenetik
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/13
Browse
Browsing Institut für Pflanzenzüchtung, Saatgutforschung und Populationsgenetik by Person "Auinger, Hans-Jürgen"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Publication Calibration and validation of predicted genomic breeding values in an advanced cycle maize population(2021) Auinger, Hans-Jürgen; Lehermeier, Christina; Gianola, Daniel; Mayer, Manfred; Melchinger, Albrecht E.; da Silva, Sofia; Knaak, Carsten; Ouzunova, Milena; Schön, Chris-CarolinThe transition from phenotypic to genome-based selection requires a profound understanding of factors that deter- mine genomic prediction accuracy. We analysed experimental data from a commercial maize breeding programme to inves- tigate if genomic measures can assist in identifying optimal calibration sets for model training. The data set consisted of six contiguous selection cycles comprising testcrosses of 5968 doubled haploid lines genotyped with a minimum of 12,000 SNP markers. We evaluated genomic prediction accuracies in two independent prediction sets in combination with calibration sets differing in sample size and genomic measures (effective sample size, average maximum kinship, expected reliability, number of common polymorphic SNPs and linkage phase similarity). Our results indicate that across selection cycles pre- diction accuracies were as high as 0.57 for grain dry matter yield and 0.76 for grain dry matter content. Including data from all selection cycles in model training yielded the best results because interactions between calibration and prediction sets as well as the effects of different testers and specific years were attenuated. Among genomic measures, the expected reliability of genomic breeding values was the best predictor of empirical accuracies obtained with different calibration sets. For grain yield, a large difference between expected and empirical reliability was observed in one prediction set. We propose to use this difference as guidance for determining the weight phenotypic data of a given selection cycle should receive in model retraining and for selection when both genomic breeding values and phenotypes are available.Publication Rapid cycling genomic selection in maize landraces(2025) Polzer, Clara; Auinger, Hans-Jürgen; Terán-Pineda, Michelle; Hölker, Armin C.; Mayer, Manfred; Presterl, Thomas; Rivera-Poulsen, Carolina; da Silva, Sofia; Ouzunova, Milena; Melchinger, Albrecht E.; Schön, Chris-CarolinKey message: A replicated experiment on genomic selection in a maize landrace provides valuable insights on the design of rapid cycling recurrent pre-breeding schemes and the factors contributing to their success. Abstract: The genetic diversity of landraces is currently underutilized for elite germplasm improvement. In this study, we investigated the potential of rapid cycling genomic selection for pre-breeding of a maize ( Zea mays L.) landrace population in replicated experiments. We trained the prediction model on a dataset (N = 899) composed of three landrace-derived doubled-haploid (DH) populations characterized for agronomic traits in 11 environments across Europe. All DH lines were genotyped with a 600 k SNP array. In two replications, three cycles of genomic selection and recombination were performed for line per se performance of early plant development, a major sustainability factor in maize production. From each cycle and replication, 100 DH lines were extracted. To evaluate selection response, the DH lines of all cycles and both replications (N = 688) were evaluated for per se performance of selected and unselected traits in seven environments. Selection was highly successful with an increase of about two standard deviations for traits under directional selection. Realized selection response was highest in the first cycle and diminished in following cycles. Selection gains predicted from genomic breeding values were only partially corroborated by realized gains estimated from adjusted means. Prediction accuracies declined sharply across cycles, but only for traits under directional selection. Retraining the prediction model with data from previous cycles improved prediction accuracies in cycles 2 and 3. Replications differed in selection response and particularly in accuracies. The experiment gives valuable insights with respect to the design of rapid cycling genomic selection schemes and the factors contributing to their success.