Institut für Agrarpolitik und Landwirtschaftliche Marktlehre
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/17
Browse
Browsing Institut für Agrarpolitik und Landwirtschaftliche Marktlehre by Sustainable Development Goals "12"
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Publication Can market fragmentation explain the limited success of political attempts to promote grain legume cultivation in Germany?(2025) Mittag, Franziska; Hess, SebastianGrain legumes, such as field peas, field beans, sweet lupins and soybeans, are known to increase biodiversity within the appropriate crop rotation and are an important source of import-substituting feed protein. National and regional policy schemes have long tried to support the cultivation of grain legumes. Although many regions in Germany offer favourable conditions for grain legumes, previous subsidy schemes have failed to increase the area under cultivation and farmers report a lack of market incentives. Indeed, the available price data exhibit a substantial share of non-random missing values in weeks when grain legumes were not traded. We analyse these non-price periods using cointegration tests and single-hurdle Tobit models. The results indicate that regional price formation for grain legumes in German regions depends not only on a minimum quantity of the respective legume crop in supply but also on a favourable supra-regional soybean price: Regional grain legume markets are not integrated and show evidence of a fragmented market structure. This may explain why local grain legume value chains have failed to emerge in Germany, despite decades of policy attempts to support these crops.Publication The economic value of pollination services for seed production: a blind spot deserving attention(2024) Feuerbacher, Arndt; Herbold, Theresa; Krumbe, FalkAnimal-mediated pollination is important for agricultural seed and crop production, and critical to overall ecosystem health. However, the scientific literature focused on the economic valuation of pollination services has thus far neglected the role of pollination services in seed production. The marketed food output of many crops is not dependent on pollination services, but these crops indirectly depend on pollination services with respect to their seed production. This study proposes a partial equilibrium framework for identifying the value of pollination services. Using Germany as a case study, we find the value of pollination services is about 33% higher when seed production is considered. This increased valuation is driven by two effects: higher seed costs due to high dependence on pollination services, and a higher demand for seeds due to the land expansion needed to mitigate a potential pollinator collapse. This study demonstrates that more sophisticated approaches are needed to estimate the economic value of pollination services more accurately.Publication Kunststoffabfallmanagement und Strategien für eine Kreislaufwirtschaft in der Lebensmittelindustrie(2025) Mielinger, Ellen; Weinrich, RamonaThe increasing global volume of waste poses a threat to the environment and the climate. Limiting the amount of waste and transforming the prevailing linear systems into a circular economy is an important task of our time. Packaging waste and especially plastic food packaging, account for a large proportion of waste due to their strong frequency and short lifespan. Avoiding waste from the outset and reducing food packaging is a top priority. At the same time, however, packaging increases the shelf life and transportability of foods, which is why it is often necessary to package food. Besides the threat to the earth’s health caused by plastic waste, food waste is also a major problem. To relieve the burden on ecosystems and achieve sustainability at all levels, it is therefore fundamental to prevent food waste and increase the recycling rates for packaging waste. In addition to technical innovations and the upgrading of recycling plants, consumer behaviour and the behaviour of the food industry play a decisive role. Through correct sorting behaviour at the household level and separately collected waste higher recycling rates can be achieved. On the other hand, which packaging and packaging materials are placed on the market by the food industry is crucial for a functioning circular economy. Against this background, the dissertation Plastic waste management and strategies for a circular economy in the food industry was authored. The first part of this dissertation analyses the introduction of sustainable food packaging from a social science perspective. Cross-national expert interviews provide information on what influences decision-making in companies in the food industry concerning sustainable packaging and what role consumers play from the experts' point of view. Although packaging sustainability is important, the economic aspect prevails when trade-offs between environmental compatibility and (additional) costs occur. According to the experts, consumers do not have sufficient knowledge and interest in packaging, leading to poor purchase decisions. This hinders the establishment of sustainable packaging. Moreover, the establishment of sustainable packaging is impeded by a certain disempowerment the interviewed experts feel exposed to. As a result, the experts dismiss the responsibility for more sustainable packaging solutions and shift it onto the state and food retailers. In line with a circular economy, in addition to the design and utilisation of environmentally friendly product packaging, the handling of the packaging after the consumption of the product is also of essential importance. Therefore, the second part of this thesis deals with the waste disposal behaviour of consumers. Influencing factors of waste separation behaviour at the private household level, preferred ways of information transmission concerning recycling rules and an extended deposit system as an approach to promoting the circular economy are analysed. Apart from packaging factors such as labels, internal factors that can be directly linked back to consumers can influence plastic packaging sorting behaviour. Focus group discussions reveal that uncertainty and confusion regarding the type of material often stand in the way of correct sorting behaviour. The internet and social media in particular are preferred for the information transmission of waste separation practices. Also, external factors, such as financial incentives or the prevalent waste disposal system, can influence consumers' sorting behaviour. One type of financial incentive is, for example, a deposit paid on single-use plastic packaging. This deposit is refunded as soon as the packaging is returned. This ensures a clean material flow, which can lead to higher recycling rates. Such a deposit refund system (DRS) already exists in Germany, including single-use beverage packages. Expert interviews with various stakeholders in the German waste management industry suggest that the success of the system in use and consumers' familiarity with it speaks for extending it also onto other single-use plastic food packages. However, this would require various different legal adjustments and the cooperation of all stakeholders involved in the process. There are also a number of organisational, economic and technical challenges that might stand in the way of an extension. In addition to the ecological optimisation of food packaging and resulting packaging waste, avoiding food waste at the private household level is an important sustainability goal. Therefore, in the digression of this work, a smartphone application aiming at reducing food waste is presented. The presented prototype can help consumers to better assess the shelf life of food and reduce uncertainty. Limitations concerning the results of the work arise primarily from the qualitative, explorative research approaches. Qualitative research is used to gain detailed and in-depth insights. Due to smaller sample sizes, it is not possible to derive generalisable results.Publication Market-based instruments for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: An evaluation of quality criteria in a German case study(2025) Streit, Lea; Feuerbacher, Arndt; Röhl, MarkusMarket-based instruments (MBIs) for the protection and promotion of biodiversity have gained significant importance in recent years. The success of MBIs depends largely on the transparent presentation of their actual effects, which rely on the quality of implementation. Quality criteria can be used to evaluate this. To date, few studies have examined whether and how these criteria are applied. This study seeks to address this gap, by using MBIs in the German agricultural landscape as a case study. Quality criteria were defined on the basis of a literature review; then applied to MBIs identified through an internet search and finally analyzed. Quality criteria related to methodological approaches (implementation, maintenance, used seed mixtures) and quality control (monitoring, localization) are presented less frequently than information on rights and obligations or the use of financial funds. Among the 151 MBIs analyzed, 70% lack control mechanisms and monitoring systems, indicating unverified effectiveness. Additionally, MBIs financed through program approaches are more likely to have control mechanisms and include perennial measures than MBIs funded by direct payments of sponsors or consumers purchasing a product. The development of MBI offerings suggests that there is persistent and growing demand, as some programs have been running for several decades. However, without ecological monitoring, it is not possible to ascertain whether these measures benefit biodiversity. To establish standardized methods for comparing MBIs for biodiversity, policymakers must consider official guidelines and, where appropriate, implement regulatory frameworks.Publication The role of biodiversity in consumer research on food : a review and research agenda(2025) Schneider, Deborah; Osieja, Sanja; Herbes, Carsten; Weinrich, RamonaThe move towards sustainable consumption has drawn significant attention from scholars and practitioners alike. Biodiversity is an integral part of environmental sustainability and food security, but it has received little attention in consumer research. Findings are fragmented into how biodiversity as a product attribute affects consumer food choices. Thus, we conducted a systematic literature review on consumer research on biodiversity in the context of food choice. We reviewed 45 papers published between 2014 and March 2025. Our analysis was guided by the TCCM (Theories, Contexts, Characteristics, and Methodology) framework for developing a systematic literature review. We examined how biodiversity was conceptualized and defined within the studies and towards study participants. Our findings show that biodiversity as a product attribute generally has positive effects on consumer attitude, willingness to pay, and product choice. However, knowledge about biodiversity and the inherent trade-offs in product choices remains limited, so consumers cannot realistically factor biodiversity into their decision-making. We find that research has taken a narrow view of biodiversity, qualitative studies are rare, and few efforts have been made to build theoretical perspectives from empirical data. We conclude with a proposed agenda for future research and a tentative definition of biodiversity for social science.Publication Sustainable food consumption and Sustainable Development Goal 12: conceptual challenges for monitoring and implementation(2024) Mensah, Kristina; Wieck, Christine; Rudloff, BettinaIn recent years, policy initiatives have been developed to promote sustainability. Although sustainable food production is an integral part of many national agricultural policies, this is not the case for sustainable food consumption. This article systematically reviews key elements of sustainable food consumption and evaluates how they align with existing policy indicators, specifically SDG 12, within the context of the agricultural policy of the European Union. Through a cross-referencing approach, this article identifies gaps and possible improvements in policy indicator frameworks to better capture elements of sustainable food consumption. We find that SDG 12 targets are not suitable to assess progress to sustainable food consumption. While targets are closely linked to environmental and economic issues, they are insufficient to monitor sustainable food consumption. Our findings suggest the necessity for enhanced or modified policy indicators that encompass the key elements of sustainable food consumption as well as a comprehensive definition of the latter to effectively design and evaluate polices on this matter.
