Achtung: hohPublica wurde am 18.11.2024 aktualisiert. Falls Sie auf Darstellungsfehler stoßen, löschen Sie bitte Ihren Browser-Cache (Strg + Umschalt + Entf). *** Attention: hohPublica was last updated on November 18, 2024. If you encounter display errors, please delete your browser cache (Ctrl + Shift + Del).

Institut für Phytomedizin

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/14

Browse

Browsing Institut für Phytomedizin by Subject "Allelopathie"

Type the first few letters and click on the Browse button
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Cover cropping in integrated weed management
    (2018) Sturm, Dominic; Gerhards, Roland
    Weed control constitutes a major challenge in the worldwide crop production. Beside chemical and mechanical weed control strategies, cover cropping provides an effective way of biological weed suppression. Five different field experiments were conducted at six locations from 2014-2016 to evaluate the weed control efficacy of different cover crops in mono and mixed cultivation combined with different fertilization strategies and sowing dates. Furthermore weed suppressing effects of cover crop mulches in spring and of living mulches in summer were investigated. Potential effects on sugar beet emergence, quality and quantity were also assessed. In three laboratory and two greenhouse experiments from 2015-2017, the proportional contribution of competitive and biochemical effects on the overall weed suppression and the identification of varying susceptibilities of different weeds against biochemical stresses were at the center of research. In field experiments, the weed suppressive effects of cover crops and living mulches in mono and mixed cultivation were tested. The experiments emphasized the importance of cover crop and living mulch mixtures compared to mono cropping due to a higher flexibility to biotic and abiotic stresses. This was followed by a more constant biomass production and more effective weed suppression. Moreover, the observed weed control was a result of competitive and biochemical effects, induced by cover crops. These were later on analyzed for active weed growth suppressing compounds. Altering cover crop sowing date and fertilization to optimize the weed control resulted in significant changes of cover crop and weed biomass. Early cover crop sowing five or three weeks before winter wheat harvest increased the weed control efficacy in one year, significantly. Due to contrary results over the two experimental years, we suggest that the cover crop biomass and consequently the weed suppressive ability depends on sufficient soil water for rapid cover crop germination and growth. The use of cover crop mulch in sugar beet crops provided a weed suppression of up to 83%. Especially mulch derived from cover crop mixtures reduced the weed density (56%) more effectively compared to mono cultivated cover crops (31%). The inclusion of cover crops, mulches and living mulches can lead to significant herbicide reductions in the main crop. However supplementary mechanical or chemical weed control strategies are still necessary, especially in crops with a low competitive ability like sugar beets. Nevertheless, novel mechanical weed control approaches and adequate herbicide application techniques, as band-spraying, can reduce the herbicide input in the long-term. Germination tests with aqueous cover crop extracts were conducted on weed seeds to evaluate differences in the inhibition of germination and root growth. Furthermore, different sensitivities of the weeds against the different cover crop extracts were revealed. Some cover crops as S. alba, F. esculentum, H. annuus, T. subterraneum and L. usitatissimum showed the most effective weed suppression. Moreover, the weed M. chamomilla showed the highest susceptibility against biochemical stresses in the germination tests. A strong positive correlation between the weed suppressive effects by the extracts and the field weed suppression was found. This indicated that biochemical effects play also an important role on the overall weed suppression in the field. To estimate the proportions of competitive and biochemical effects on the overall weed suppression by cover crops, greenhouse experiments with active carbon supplemented soil were conducted. These experiments revealed that biochemical effects, by the presence of active carbon in the soil, shifted the balance of competition between cover crops and weeds. In the course of the experiments, we also found species-specific effects on the donor as well as on the receiver side. The results of this thesis demonstrate the diverse use of cover crops, their mulches and living mulches in agricultural systems. This work aims on the optimization of biological weed control strategies and indicates approaches for future research. It is for example not yet clear how cover crops suppress specific weeds and if it is possible to design combinations of specific cover crops for the suppression of individual weed communities. Additionally, these results help to reduce long-term herbicide inputs in agricultural systems.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Evaluating different management strategies to increase the effectiveness of winter cover crops as an integrated weed management measure
    (2020) Schappert, Alexandra; Gerhards, Roland
    Weed control in agricultural production systems is indispensable to achieve stable crop yields. Integrated cropping systems are demanding for preventive and ecologically harmless weed control measures in order to protect soil and water resources and to retard the selection of herbicide-resistant weeds. Well-established winter cover crops provide nutrient retention and soil protection and may effectively suppress weeds. This contributes to reduce chemical and mechanical fall- and spring-applied weed control practices. However, producers are cautious towards integrating cover crops in crop rotations, as their performance is related to environmental conditions and varies, therefore, significantly from season to season. To increase their integration into cropping systems, reliability on weed control by cover crops needs to improve. In the current study, management strategies such as i) the cover crop sowing method, ii) the selection of water deficit tolerating cover crop species, iii) cover crop species combinations, iv) the adjustment of the mulching date and v) tillage practices after cover crop cultivation were considered as possibilities to improve the effectiveness of cover crops to control weeds during cultivation and in the subsequent cash crop. Within the first and the second publication, the general weed and A. myosuroides control ability of a cover crops mixture during and after cultivation were compared in the field with various fall-applied tillage methods and glyphosate treatments. Due to the development of highly competitive cover crop stands, weeds were suppressed by 98% and A. myosuroides by 100% during cultivation. Therefore, cover crops were more efficient compared to glyphosate application(s), non-inversion and inversion tillage and revealed a great potential to reduce or even replace chemical and mechanical fall-applied weed control measures. The efficient A. myosuroides control during the cover crop cultivation remained until spring barley harvest. This quantifies cover crops to complement herbicide resistance management strategies. In contrast, due to the weak cover crop performance during fall-to-winter within another two experiments included in the second article, weed suppressive effects of cover crops disappeared after the cultivation of cover crops. This might have been the reason why reduced tillage and adjusted mulching dates in spring failed in contributing to expand weed suppressive effects of cover crops in these experiments. Cover crop mixtures are attributed to show a greater resilience against unfavorable conditions than pure cover crop stands which is expected to result in an increased weed suppression ability. Within article three, the weed control efficacy of pure cover crop stands was compared with species mixtures. Pure stands of Avena strigosa Schreb. and Raphanus sativus var. oleiformis Pers. provided the most efficient weed control with 83% and 72%, respectively. Cover crop species mixtures showed a weaker weed suppression ability than the most efficient pure stand. In order to improve the weed control ability of cover crop mixtures, it was evaluated that the species selection is more relevant than the species diversity. Thereby, environmental requirements, such as water and temperature demand, and weed suppression mechanisms should be considered. Weed suppression of mixtures was improved by increasing the proportions of A. strigosa and R. sativus var. oleiformis, as they were showing a susceptibility for dry conditions and combine a strong competition for resources and allelopathic interference with weeds. Within the fourth article, it was explored whether a low susceptibility of single cover crop species to water-limitations accompanies an improved weed suppression ability. A. strigosa and Sinapis alba L. showed differing suitabilities to cope with water-deficit in the greenhouse. A relation between weed suppression and water demand of cover crops at the field was not identified. Although the weed control ability of cover crops is generally narrowed under water-limited conditions, the weed suppression potential of individual species seems to be independent of their water supply. The adjustment of the cover crop sowing method, the consideration of species-specific requirements and the mixing strategies, were evaluated as being important to improve the resilience of cover crops against severe environmental conditions and their weed control ability. Investigations of cover crop mixtures with respect to single component species, their mixing ratios and seed densities, might further increase the absolute and average effectiveness of cover crops as an integrated weed management practice.