A new version of this entry is available:

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Article
2025

How comprehensible are scientific experts? A multi-method comparison of linguistic analyses, surveys, and real-time audience responses

Abstract

The comprehensibility of scientific experts is fundamentally important but presents a challenge for experts and their audiences. The definition and evaluation of comprehensibility are central to developing approaches for improvement. On the one hand, comprehensibility can be indicated by linguistic measures; on the other hand, audience assessments represent comprehensibility perceptions. However, the extent of overlap between these perspectives remains unknown. We conducted two studies to address this gap by analyzing five debates on various scientific topics, each featuring three experts. Our approach involved an integration of computational linguistic analyses, surveys, and real-time response measurements. The findings demonstrate that content and linguistic complexity appear complementary in their relationships with audience ratings for comprehensibility. Interestingly, more complex expert statements corresponded to higher overall debate ratings, hinting at the potential influence of human factors. Therefore, recognizing this influence is critical for improving the communication between experts and laypeople.

File is subject to an embargo until

This is a correction to:

A correction to this entry is available:

This is a new version of:

Other version

Notes

Publication license

Publication series

Published in

Frontiers in communication, 10 (2025), 1580377. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1580377. ISSN: 2297-900X

Other version

Faculty

Institute

Examination date

Supervisor

Cite this publication

Taddicken, M., & Thoms, C. (2025). How comprehensible are scientific experts? A multi-method comparison of linguistic analyses, surveys, and real-time audience responses. Frontiers in communication, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1580377

Edition / version

Citation

DOI

ISSN

ISBN

Language

English

Publisher

Publisher place

Classification (DDC)

400 Language

Original object

University bibliography

Standardized keywords (GND)

Sustainable Development Goals

BibTeX

@article{Taddicken2025, doi = {10.3389/fcomm.2025.1580377}, author = {Taddicken, Monika and Thoms, Claudia}, title = {How comprehensible are scientific experts? A multi-method comparison of linguistic analyses, surveys, and real-time audience responses}, journal = {Frontiers in Communication}, year = {2025}, volume = {10}, }

Share this publication