A new version of this entry is available:
Abstract (English)
Mercantilist theories and policies in early capitalism have been criticized for confusing microeconomic and macroeconomic sources of wealth, for misunderstanding the benefits of free trade, and for overrating the role of money. This paper aims to reconstruct the rationality of mercantilism as an efficient strategy of economic development. It presents a critical assessment of David Hume’s specie flow mechanism that counts as a major rebuttal of mercantilism and collects insights of early writers into the working of a monetary economy.
File is subject to an embargo until
This is a correction to:
A correction to this entry is available:
This is a new version of:
Notes
Publication license
Publication series
Hohenheim discussion papers in business, economics and social sciences; 2018,26
Published in
Other version
Faculty
Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences
Institute
Institute of Economics
Examination date
Supervisor
Edition / version
Citation
Identification
DOI
ISSN
ISBN
Language
English
Publisher
Publisher place
Classification (DDC)
330 Economics
Original object
Free keywords
Standardized keywords (GND)
Sustainable Development Goals
BibTeX
@techreport{Spahn2018,
url = {https://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/6326},
author = {Spahn, Peter},
title = {Was war falsch am Merkantilismus?},
year = {2018},
school = {Universität Hohenheim},
series = {Hohenheim discussion papers in business, economics and social sciences},
}