Bitte beachten Sie: Im Zeitraum vom 21.12.2024 bis zum 07.01.2025 werden auf hohPublica keine Anfragen oder Publikationen durch das KIM bearbeitet. Please note: KIM will not process any requests or publications on hohPublica between December 21, 2024 and January 7, 2025.
 

Effects of farmland conversion to orchard or agroforestry on soil organic carbon fractions in an arid desert oasis area

dc.contributor.authorWang, Weixia
dc.contributor.authorIngwersen, Joachim
dc.contributor.authorYang, Guang
dc.contributor.authorWang, Zhenxi
dc.contributor.authorAlimu, Aliya
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-06T10:17:29Z
dc.date.available2024-11-06T10:17:29Z
dc.date.issued2022de
dc.description.abstractIn southern Xinjiang province, northwest China, farmland is undergoing rapid conversion to orchards or agroforestry. This has improved land-use efficiency but has also caused drastic ecological changes in this region. This study investigated the effects of farmland conversion to orchard or agroforestry on soil total organic carbon (TOC) and several soil labile fractions: readily oxidizable carbon (ROC), light fraction organic carbon (LFOC), and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Soil samples were collected from seven cropping treatments: a monocultured wheat field (Mono), a 5-year-old jujube orchard (5 J), a 5-year-old jujube/wheat alley cropping system (5 JW), a 10-year-old jujube orchard (10 J), a 10-year-old jujube/wheat alley cropping system (10 JW), a 15-year-old jujube orchard (15 J), and a 15-year-old jujube/wheat alley cropping system (15 JW). The results show that the ROC concentrations varied from 0.17 ± 0.09 g/kg to 2.35 ± 0.05 g/kg across all land-use types and soil depths studied. It was higher in the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm layers of treatment 10 JW than in other treatments and significantly greater than in the Mono treatment. The highest value of DOC was reached at 593.04 mg/kg in the 15 JW treatment at 0–10 cm. Labile organic carbon decreased with increasing depth in all treatments. The proportion of ROC and LFOC to TOC decreased with increasing soil depth. In all treatments, the ratio of DOC to TOC generally decreased initially and then increased again with increasing depth. Correlation analysis showed that ROC, LFOC, and DOC were closely correlated with TOC (p < 0.01). The ROC, LFOC, and DOC concentrations were significantly correlated with each other (p < 0.01). Following conversion of farmland to jujube orchard or agroforestry, the content and activity of soil organic carbon tended to increase due to augmentation of plant residues. Thus, jujube orchards and agroforestry systems are effective methods to restore soil organic carbon.en
dc.identifier.swb1794964681
dc.identifier.urihttps://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/16854
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/f13020181
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rights.licensecc_byde
dc.source1999-4907de
dc.sourceForests; Vol. 13, No. 2 (2022) 181de
dc.subjectSoil labile fractions
dc.subjectLand use
dc.subjectJujube orchard
dc.subjectAgroforestry systems
dc.subject.ddc630
dc.titleEffects of farmland conversion to orchard or agroforestry on soil organic carbon fractions in an arid desert oasis areaen
dc.type.diniArticle
dcterms.bibliographicCitationForests, 13 (2022), 2, 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020181. ISSN: 1999-4907
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issn1999-4907
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issue2
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleForests
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume13
local.export.bibtex@article{Wang2022, url = {https://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/16854}, doi = {10.3390/f13020181}, author = {Wang, Weixia and Ingwersen, Joachim and Yang, Guang et al.}, title = {Effects of Farmland Conversion to Orchard or Agroforestry on Soil Organic Carbon Fractions in an Arid Desert Oasis Area}, journal = {Forests}, year = {2022}, }
local.export.bibtexAuthorWang, Weixia and Ingwersen, Joachim and Yang, Guang et al.
local.export.bibtexKeyWang2022
local.export.bibtexType@article

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
forests-13-00181-v2.pdf
Size:
2.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format