Achtung: hohPublica wurde am 18.11.2024 aktualisiert. Falls Sie auf Darstellungsfehler stoßen, löschen Sie bitte Ihren Browser-Cache (Strg + Umschalt + Entf). *** Attention: hohPublica was last updated on November 18, 2024. If you encounter display errors, please delete your browser cache (Ctrl + Shift + Del).
 

A new version of this entry is available:

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Abstract (English)

Though contingent valuation is the dominant technique for the valuation of public projects, especially in the environmental sector, the high costs of contingent valuation surveys prevent the use of this method for the assessment of relatively small projects. The reason for this cost problem is that typically only contingent valuation studies which are based on face-to-face interviews are accepted as leading to valid results. Especially in countries with high wages face-to-face surveys are extremely costly considering that for a valid contingent valuation study a minimum of 1,000 completed face-to-face interviews is required. In this paper we try a rehabilitation of mail surveys as low-budget substitutes for costly face-to-face surveys. Based on an empirical contingent valuation study in Northern Thailand we show that the validity of mail surveys can be improved significantly if so-called citizen expert groups are employed for a thorough survey design.

File is subject to an embargo until

This is a correction to:

A correction to this entry is available:

This is a new version of:

Notes

Publication license

Publication series

Hohenheimer Diskussionsbeiträge; 297

Published in

Faculty
Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences
Institute
Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre (bis 2010)

Examination date

Supervisor

Edition / version

Citation

DOI

ISSN

ISBN

Language
English

Publisher

Publisher place

Classification (DDC)
330 Economics

Original object

Free keywords

Standardized keywords (GND)

Sustainable Development Goals

BibTeX

@techreport{Sinphurmsukskul2008, url = {https://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/5182}, author = {Sinphurmsukskul, Nopasom and Sangkapitux, Chapika and Neef, Andreas et al.}, title = {Better than their reputation : a case for mail surveys in contingent valuation}, year = {2008}, school = {Universität Hohenheim}, series = {Hohenheimer Diskussionsbeiträge}, }
Share this publication