A new version of this entry is available:
Loading...
Article
2025
How comprehensible are scientific experts? A multi-method comparison of linguistic analyses, surveys, and real-time audience responses
How comprehensible are scientific experts? A multi-method comparison of linguistic analyses, surveys, and real-time audience responses
Abstract
The comprehensibility of scientific experts is fundamentally important but presents a challenge for experts and their audiences. The definition and evaluation of comprehensibility are central to developing approaches for improvement. On the one hand, comprehensibility can be indicated by linguistic measures; on the other hand, audience assessments represent comprehensibility perceptions. However, the extent of overlap between these perspectives remains unknown. We conducted two studies to address this gap by analyzing five debates on various scientific topics, each featuring three experts. Our approach involved an integration of computational linguistic analyses, surveys, and real-time response measurements. The findings demonstrate that content and linguistic complexity appear complementary in their relationships with audience ratings for comprehensibility. Interestingly, more complex expert statements corresponded to higher overall debate ratings, hinting at the potential influence of human factors. Therefore, recognizing this influence is critical for improving the communication between experts and laypeople.
File is subject to an embargo until
This is a correction to:
A correction to this entry is available:
This is a new version of:
Other version
Notes
Publication license
Publication series
Published in
Frontiers in communication, 10 (2025), 1580377.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1580377.
ISSN: 2297-900X
Other version
Faculty
Institute
Examination date
Supervisor
Cite this publication
Taddicken, M., & Thoms, C. (2025). How comprehensible are scientific experts? A multi-method comparison of linguistic analyses, surveys, and real-time audience responses. Frontiers in communication, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1580377
Edition / version
Citation
DOI
ISSN
ISBN
Language
English
Publisher
Publisher place
Classification (DDC)
400 Language
Collections
Original object
University bibliography
Standardized keywords (GND)
Sustainable Development Goals
BibTeX
@article{Taddicken2025,
doi = {10.3389/fcomm.2025.1580377},
author = {Taddicken, Monika and Thoms, Claudia},
title = {How comprehensible are scientific experts? A multi-method comparison of linguistic analyses, surveys, and real-time audience responses},
journal = {Frontiers in Communication},
year = {2025},
volume = {10},
}