Does a smarter ChatGPT become more utilitarian?

dc.contributor.authorPfeffer, Jürgen
dc.contributor.authorKrügel, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorUhl, Matthias
dc.contributor.corporatePfeffer, Jürgen; Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Social Sciences and Technology, Munich, Germany
dc.contributor.corporateKrügel, Sebastian; Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
dc.contributor.corporateUhl, Matthias; Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-28T10:54:39Z
dc.date.available2026-01-28T10:54:39Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.date.updated2026-01-23T13:56:38Z
dc.description.abstractHundreds of millions of users interact with large language models (LLMs) regularly to get advice on all aspects of life. The increase in LLMs’ logical capabilities might be accompanied by unintended side effects with ethical implications. Focusing on recent model developments of ChatGPT, we can show clear evidence for a systematic shift in ethical stances that accompanied a leap in the models’ logical capabilities. Specifically, as ChatGPT’s capacity grows, it tends to give decisively more utilitarian answers to the two most famous dilemmas in ethics. Given the documented impact that LLMs have on users, we call for a research focus on the prevalence and dominance of ethical theories in LLMs as well as their potential shift over time. Moreover, our findings highlight the need for continuous monitoring and transparent public reporting of LLMs’ moral reasoning to ensure their informed and responsible use.en
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversität Hohenheim (3153)
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-025-00579-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/18802
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.licensecc_by
dc.subjectLarge language models
dc.subjectUtilitarianism
dc.subjectEthical theories
dc.subjectChatGPT
dc.subjectTrolley dilemma
dc.subject.ddc170
dc.titleDoes a smarter ChatGPT become more utilitarian?en
dc.type.diniArticle
dcterms.bibliographicCitationScience and engineering ethics, 32 (2026), 1, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-025-00579-4. ISSN: 1471-5546 Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issn1471-5546
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issue1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleScience and engineering ethics
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameSpringer Netherlands
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplaceDordrecht
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume32
local.export.bibtex@article{Pfeffer2026, doi = {10.1007/s11948-025-00579-4}, author = {Pfeffer, Jürgen and Krügel, Sebastian and Uhl, Matthias et al.}, title = {Does a Smarter ChatGPT Become More Utilitarian?}, journal = {Science and Engineering Ethics}, year = {2026}, volume = {32}, number = {1}, }
local.subject.sdg9
local.subject.sdg16
local.title.fullDoes a Smarter ChatGPT Become More Utilitarian?

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
11948_2025_Article_579.pdf
Size:
752.58 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
7.85 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: