A new version of this entry is available:
Loading...
ResearchPaper
2009
Can international migration ever be made a Pareto improvement?
Can international migration ever be made a Pareto improvement?
Abstract (English)
We argue that compensating losers is more difficult for immigration than for trade and capital movements. While a tax-cum-subsidy mechanism allows the government to turn the gains from trade into a Pareto improvement, the same is not true for the so-called immigration surplus, if the redistributive mechanism is not allowed to discriminate against migrants. We discuss policy conclusions to be drawn from this fundamental asymmetry between migration and other forms of globalization.
File is subject to an embargo until
This is a correction to:
A correction to this entry is available:
This is a new version of:
Notes
Publication license
Publication series
Hohenheimer Diskussionsbeiträge; 305
Published in
Faculty
Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences
Institute
Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre (bis 2010)
Examination date
Supervisor
Edition / version
Citation
Identification
DOI
ISSN
ISBN
Language
English
Publisher
Publisher place
Classification (DDC)
330 Economics
Original object
Free keywords
Standardized keywords (GND)
Sustainable Development Goals
BibTeX
@techreport{Felbermayr2009,
url = {https://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/5237},
author = {Felbermayr, Gabriel and Kohler, Wilhelm},
title = {Can international migration ever be made a Pareto improvement?},
year = {2009},
school = {Universität Hohenheim},
series = {Hohenheimer Diskussionsbeiträge},
}