Achtung: hohPublica wurde am 18.11.2024 aktualisiert. Falls Sie auf Darstellungsfehler stoßen, löschen Sie bitte Ihren Browser-Cache (Strg + Umschalt + Entf). *** Attention: hohPublica was last updated on November 18, 2024. If you encounter display errors, please delete your browser cache (Ctrl + Shift + Del).
 

Insect conservation in agricultural landscapes needs both high crop heterogeneity and semi-natural habitats

dc.contributor.authorTassoni, Sara
dc.contributor.authorBecker, David
dc.contributor.authorKasten, Marit Kinga
dc.contributor.authorMoriníere, Jérôme
dc.contributor.authorGrass, Ingo
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-18T13:45:36Z
dc.date.available2024-11-18T13:45:36Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractIdentifying landscapes that are suitable for both biodiversity conservation and agricultural production is a major challenge. Traditionally, much research has focused on biodiversity conservation outside of agricultural production areas, e.g., in semi-natural habitats. In contrast, recent research has mainly focused on the potential of crop heterogeneity. This includes both compositional (crop diversity) and configurational heterogeneity (field border density). However, if and how crop heterogeneity, and semi-natural habitats interact to shape insect diversity in agricultural landscapes remains poorly understood. Here we investigated the combined effects of crop diversity, field border density, and semi-natural habitats (i.e., grassland proportion, hedge density) on insect diversity. We sampled insect communities from 14 – 17 June 2021 with pan traps in 27 study landscapes (500 m x 500 m) covering independent gradients of these landscape variables and identified a total of 587 insect species with DNA metabarcoding. We found that field border density mediated the effects of crop diversity, grassland proportion, and hedge density on insect richness. At low levels of field border density (i.e., landscapes with mostly large fields), effects were either neutral (crop diversity), negative (grassland proportion) or weakly positive (hedge density). By contrast, at high levels of field border density, crop diversity, grassland proportion, and hedge density all exerted positive effects on insect richness. Responses to crop heterogeneity and semi-natural habitat differed among trophic groups of insects (decomposers, herbivores, parasitoids, predators). While variation in richness of herbivorous insects followed the patterns of the overall richness, decomposer richness was not related to any of the investigated variables. Predator richness increased with hedge density in landscapes, whereas parasitoid richness increased when high levels of field border density and grassland proportion coincided. Our study shows that increasing crop heterogeneity is a viable strategy for promoting insect diversity in agricultural landscapes. However, the effects of the amount of remaining semi-natural habitats, such as grassland or hedges, are mediated by configurational heterogeneity, and vary between trophic groups. Efforts to conserve insects in agricultural landscapes must therefore focus on both increasing the heterogeneity of the crop matrix by promoting crop diversity and increasing the density of field borders, while also maintaining or restoring semi-natural habitats as important source habitats for insect species.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/16911
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03218
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.licensecc_by
dc.sourceGlobal ecology and conservation; Vol. 55, (2024) e03218
dc.source2351-9894
dc.subjectLandscape complexity
dc.subjectCrop heterogeneity
dc.subjectInsect richness
dc.subjectAgricultural diversification
dc.subjectSemi-natural habitat
dc.subject.ddc570
dc.titleInsect conservation in agricultural landscapes needs both high crop heterogeneity and semi-natural habitatsen
dc.type.diniArticle
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGlobal ecology and conservation; Vol. 55, (2024) e03218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03218. ISSN: 2351-9894
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumbere03218
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.issn2351-9894
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleGlobal ecology and conservation
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameElsevier
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplaceAmsterdam
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume55
local.export.bibtex@article{Tassoni2024, url = {https://hohpublica.uni-hohenheim.de/handle/123456789/16911}, doi = {10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03218}, author = {Tassoni, Sara and Becker, David and Kasten, Marit Kinga et al.}, title = {Insect conservation in agricultural landscapes needs both high crop heterogeneity and semi-natural habitats}, journal = {Global ecology and conservation}, year = {2024}, volume = {55}, }
local.export.bibtexAuthorTassoni, Sara and Becker, David and Kasten, Marit Kinga et al.
local.export.bibtexKeyTassoni2024
local.export.bibtexType@article

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S2351989424004220-main.pdf
Size:
3.88 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
ScienceDirect_files_18Nov2024_13-44-00.657.zip
Size:
4.88 MB
Format:
Unknown data format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
7.85 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: